The task-dependent use of binocular disparity and motion parallax information

被引:74
作者
Bradshaw, MF [1 ]
Parton, AD
Glennerster, A
机构
[1] Univ Surrey, Sch Human Sci, Dept Psychol, Guildford GU2 7XH, Surrey, England
[2] Univ Oxford, Physiol Lab, Oxford OX1 3PT, England
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0042-6989(00)00214-5
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Binocular disparity and motion parallax are powerful cues to the relative depth between objects. However to recover absolute depth, either additional scaling parameters are required to calibrate the information provided by each cue, or it can be recovered through the combination of information from both cues (Richards, W. (1985). Structure from stereo and motion. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 2, 343-349). However, not all tasks necessarily require a full specification of the absolute depth structure of a scene and so psychophysical performance may vary depending on the amount of information available, and the degree to which absolute depth structure is required. The experiments reported here used three different tasks that varied in the type of geometric information required in order for them to be completed successfully. These included a depth nulling task, a depth-matching task, and an absolute depth judgement (shape) task. Real world stimuli were viewed (i) monocularly with head movements, (ii) binocularly and static, or (iii) binocularly with head movements. No effect of viewing condition was found whereas there was a large effect of task. Performance was accurate on the matching and nulling tasks and much less accurate on the shape task. The fact that the same perceptual distortions were not evident in all tasks suggests that the visual system can switch strategy according to the demands of the particular task. No evidence was found to suggest that the visual system could exploit the simultaneous presence of disparity and motion parallax. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3725 / 3734
页数:10
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   The interaction of binocular disparity and motion parallax in the computation of depth [J].
Bradshaw, MF ;
Rogers, BJ .
VISION RESEARCH, 1996, 36 (21) :3457-3468
[2]   Sensitivity to horizontal and vertical corrugations defined by binocular disparity [J].
Bradshaw, MF ;
Rogers, BJ .
VISION RESEARCH, 1999, 39 (18) :3049-3056
[3]   The effect of display size on disparity scaling from differential perspective and vergence cues [J].
Bradshaw, MF ;
Glennerster, A ;
Rogers, BJ .
VISION RESEARCH, 1996, 36 (09) :1255-1264
[4]   The interaction of binocular disparity and motion parallax in determining perceived depth and perceived size [J].
Bradshaw, MF ;
Parton, AD ;
Eagle, RA .
PERCEPTION, 1998, 27 (11) :1317-1331
[5]  
BRADSHAW MF, 1987, PERCEPTION, V16, P361
[6]  
BRAUNSTEIN ML, 1993, J EXP PSYCHOL HUMAN, V19, P598
[7]  
Brenner E., 1997, Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, V38, pS1010
[8]   Interaction between the perceived shape of two objects [J].
Brenner, E ;
Landy, MS .
VISION RESEARCH, 1999, 39 (23) :3834-3848
[9]   THE INTERACTION OF OCULOMOTOR CUES AND STIMULUS SIZE IN STEREOSCOPIC DEPTH CONSTANCY [J].
COLLETT, TS ;
SCHWARZ, U ;
SOBEL, EC .
PERCEPTION, 1991, 20 (06) :733-754
[10]   COMPARING DEPTH FROM MOTION WITH DEPTH FROM BINOCULAR DISPARITY [J].
DURGIN, FH ;
PROFFITT, DR ;
OLSON, TJ ;
REINKE, KS .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1995, 21 (03) :679-699