Practice of sedation and analgesia in German intensive care units: results of a national survey

被引:65
作者
Martin, J [1 ]
Parsch, A
Franck, M
Wernecke, KD
Fischer, M
Spies, C
机构
[1] Hosp Eichert, Dept Anesthesiol Intens Care Med & Pain Therapy, Goppingen, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp Charite, Dept Anesthesiol & Intens Care Med, Berlin, Germany
[3] Univ Hosp Charite, Inst Med Biometr, Berlin, Germany
来源
CRITICAL CARE | 2005年 / 9卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
10.1186/cc3035
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Introduction Sedation and analgesia are provided by using different agents and techniques in different countries. The goal is to achieve early spontaneous breathing and to obtain an awake and cooperative pain-free patient. It was the aim of this study to conduct a survey of the agents and techniques used for analgesia and sedation in intensive care units in Germany. Methods A survey was sent by mail to 261 hospitals in Germany. The anesthesiologists running the intensive care unit were asked to fill in the structured questionnaire about their use of sedation and analgesia. Results A total of 220 (84%) questionnaires were completed and returned. The RAMSAY sedation scale was used in 8% of the hospitals. A written policy was available in 21% of hospitals. For short-term sedation in most hospitals, propofol was used in combination with sufentanil or fentanyl. For long-term sedation, midazolam/fentanyl was preferred. Clonidine was a common part of up to two-thirds of the regimens. Epidural analgesia was used in up to 68%. Neuromuscular blocking agents were no longer used. Conclusion In contrast to the US 'Clinical practice guidelines for the sustained use of sedatives and analgesics in the critically ill adult', our survey showed that in Germany different agents, and frequently neuroaxial techniques, were used.
引用
收藏
页码:R117 / R123
页数:7
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] AST PH, 1984, LANCET, V2, P863
  • [2] Pharmacoeconomic assessment of propofol 2% used for prolonged sedation
    Barrientos-Vega, R
    Sánchez-Soria, MM
    Morales-Garcia, C
    Cuena-Boy, R
    Castellano-Hernández, M
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2001, 29 (02) : 317 - 322
  • [3] Epidural analgesia reduces postoperative myocardial infarction: A meta-analysis
    Beattie, WS
    Badner, NH
    Choi, P
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2001, 93 (04) : 853 - 858
  • [4] BION JF, 1987, INTENS CARE MED, V13, P215
  • [5] CLONIDINE AS A SEDATIVE ADJUNCT IN INTENSIVE-CARE
    BOHRER, H
    BACH, A
    LAYER, M
    WERNING, P
    [J]. INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 1990, 16 (04) : 265 - 266
  • [6] IMPORTANCE OF EFFECTIVE PAIN CONTROL
    BONICA, JJ
    [J]. ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1987, 31 : 1 - 16
  • [7] Quality improvement report - Effect of a scoring system and protocol for sedation on duration of patients' need for ventilator support in a surgical intensive care unit
    Brattebo, G
    Hofoss, D
    Flaatten, H
    Muri, AK
    Gjerde, S
    Plsek, PE
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 324 (7350): : 1386 - 1389
  • [8] Emetic effects of morphine and piritramide
    Breitfeld, C
    Peters, J
    Vockel, T
    Lorenz, C
    Eikermann, M
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2003, 91 (02) : 218 - 223
  • [9] Multimodal perioperative management - Combining thoracic epidural analgesia, forced mobilization, and oral nutrition - Reduces hormonal and metabolic stress and improves convalescence after major urologic surgery
    Brodner, G
    Van Aken, H
    Hertle, L
    Fobker, M
    Von Eckardstein, A
    Goeters, C
    Buerkle, H
    Harks, A
    Kehlet, H
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2001, 92 (06) : 1594 - 1600
  • [10] THE USE OF SEDATIVE AGENTS IN CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS
    BURNS, AM
    SHELLY, MP
    PARK, GR
    [J]. DRUGS, 1992, 43 (04) : 507 - 515