Spatial multi-database topological continuity and indexing: a step towards seamless GIS data interoperability

被引:42
作者
Laurini, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lyon 1, Inst Natl Sci Appl, Lab Ingn Syst Informat, F-69621 Villeurbanne, France
关键词
D O I
10.1080/136588198241842
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
This paper presents some problems and solutions concerning the federation of several geographical databases, in the context of interoperability. When a multi-database query is executed, it is important to route it only to sites which are likely to contribute to the answer, whatever the fragmentation might be, geographical, thematic or heterogeneous. Secondly, when the answer implies several spatial databases, it is important that not only boundary alignment is achieved, but also topological continuity. After describing several general problems and concepts about distributed spatial databases and their integration, structures for spatial indexing in multi-database systems are described, giving emphasis to local and global spatial indices. An r-tree-like structure is proposed for organizing those global indices. Geographical fragmentation presents disadvantages to artificially cut geographical objects, such as roads, rivers, etc. In other words, some objects, called fragmented objects, have the particularity of having several database identifiers tone per site) and a mechanism must be provided in order to re-construct those objects when necessary. In this paper, special tools are presented in order to ensure continuity of fragmented objects, semantically (at the level of identifiers), topologically (at the level of data structure) and geometrically (at the level of coordinates, possibly with errors). In order to accelerate queries against fragmented objects, some adjacency tables must be constructed. Truly seamless GIS data will only exist on the Internet once spatial continuity is ensured.
引用
收藏
页码:373 / 402
页数:30
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
AUFAUREPORTIER MA, 1994, 5 EUR C GIS EGIS PAR, P1807
[2]  
BELL D, 1992, DISTRIBUTED DATABASE
[3]  
BELL SBM, 1986, SPATIAL DATA PROCESS
[4]  
BOBAK AR, 1993, DISTRIBUTED MULTIDAT
[5]  
BUELHER K, OPENGIS GUIDE INTRO
[6]  
Bugayevskiy L.M., 1995, MAP PROJECTIONS REFE
[7]  
DATE C.J., 1987, INFODB, V2
[8]  
Guttman A., 1984, P ACM SIGMOD INT C M, P47, DOI DOI 10.1145/602259.602266
[9]  
HUANG YW, 1995, 3 ACM INT WORKSH ADV, P93
[10]   CLASSIFYING SCHEMATIC AND DATA HETEROGENEITY IN MULTIDATABASE SYSTEMS [J].
KIM, W ;
SEO, JY .
COMPUTER, 1991, 24 (12) :12-18