Is competition such a good thing? Static efficiency versus dynamic efficiency

被引:32
作者
Blaug, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1023/A:1011160622792
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper addresses the rationale for antitrust legislation. It is a striking fact that the legitimacy of antitrust law has been taken for granted in the United States ever since the Sherman Act of 1890 and, until the advent of the so-called Chicago School, it was even taken for granted by conservative American economists. Europeans, on the other hand, have always been lukewarm about legal action against trusts and cartels and this attitude is found right across the political spectrum in most European countries. Nevertheless, in both the U.S.A. and Europe, the ultimate justification for antitrust law derives from economic doctrine regarding the beneficial effects of competition. But what exactly are these beneficial effects and how secure is the contention of economists that competition is always superior to monopoly? Surprisingly enough, competition, that central concept of economics, is widely misunderstood by many economists, both as a market phenomenon and as an organizing principle of economic reasoning.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 48
页数:12
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1995, PERFECT COMPETITION, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203429259
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1978, ANTITRUST PARADOX PO
  • [3] [Anonymous], NOT ONLY EC RECENT E
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2000, Encyclopedia of Law and Economics
  • [5] [Anonymous], 1964, American Economic Review
  • [6] HENNIPMAN,PIETER ON PARETIAN WELFARE ECONOMICS - A COMMENT
    BLAUG, M
    [J]. ECONOMIST, 1993, 141 (01): : 127 - 129
  • [7] Blaug M., 1992, METHODOLOGY EC
  • [8] Clark JohnM., 1961, COMPETITION DYNAMIC
  • [9] Coase R.H., 1988, FIRM MARKET LAW
  • [10] Debreu G., 1959, THEORY VALUE AXIOMAT, V17