Prevalence and prognosis of shunting across patent foramen ovale during acute respiratory distress syndrome

Objective: Right-to-left shunting across a patent foramen ovale may occur in acute respiratory distress syndrome as a result of pulmonary hypertension and positive-pressure mechanical ventilation. The shunt may worsen the hypoxemia. The objective of our study was to determine the prevalence, clinical implications, and prognosis of patent foramen ovale shunting during acute respiratory distress syndrome. Design: Prospective study. Setting: Medical intensive care unit of a university hospital in Creteil, France. Patients: Two hundred three consecutive patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Interventions: Patent foramen ovale shunting was detected by using transesophageal echocardiography with modified gelatin contrast. Moderate-to-large shunting was defined as right-to-left passage of at least 10 bubbles through a valve-like structure within three cardiac cycles after complete opacification of the right atrium. In 85 patients without and 31 with shunting, the influence of the positive end-expiratory pressure level on shunting was studied. Measurements and Results: The prevalence of moderate-to-large patent foramen ovale shunting was 19.2% (39 patients). Compared to those in the group without shunting, the patients in group with shunting had larger right ventricle dimensions, higher pulmonary artery systolic pressure, and a higher prevalence of cor pulmonale. Compared to patients without shunting, patients with shunting had a poorer Pao(2)/Fio(2) ratio response to positive end-expiratory pressure, more often required prone positioning and nitric oxide as adjunctive interventions, and had fewer ventilator-free and intensive care unit-free days within the first 28 days. Conclusions: Moderate-to-large patent foramen ovale shunting occurred in 19.2% of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome, in keeping with findings from autopsy studies. Patent foramen ovale was associated with a poor oxygenation response to positive end-expiratory pressure, greater use of adjunctive interventions, and a longer intensive care unit stay. (Crit Care Med 2010; 38:1786-1792)