Are different groups of patients with stroke more likely to be excluded from the new UK general medical services contract? A cross-sectional retrospective analysis of a large primary care population

被引:15
作者
Simpson, Colin R.
Hannaford, Philip C.
McGovern, Matthew
Taylor, Michael W.
Green, Paul N.
Lefevre, Karen
Williams, David J.
机构
[1] Univ Aberdeen, Dept Gen Practice & Primary Care, Foresterhill Hlth Ctr, Aberdeen AB25 2AY, Scotland
[2] Kemnay Med Grp, Kemnay, Aberdeen, Scotland
[3] Grampian Univ Hosp Trust, Dept Clin Pharmacol, Aberdeen, Scotland
来源
BMC FAMILY PRACTICE | 2007年 / 8卷
关键词
OUTCOMES FRAMEWORK; DEPRIVATION; MANAGEMENT; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2296-8-56
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: In April 2004, an incentive based contract was introduced to UK primary care. An important element of the new contract is the ability to exclude individuals from quality indicators for a variety of reasons (known as 'exception reporting'). Exception of patients with stroke or TIA from the recording and achievement of quality indicators may have important consequences in terms of stroke recurrence and mortality. Methods: A cross-sectional retrospective analysis of anonymised patient data was performed using 312 Scottish primary care practices. Results: Patients recorded as unsuitable for inclusion in the contract were more likely to be female (odds ratio (OR) 1.51, 95% confidence interval (Cl) 1.36-1.68), older (>75 years: OR 3.15, 95% Cl 2.69-3.69), and have dementia (OR 4.40, 95% Cl 3.57-5.43) when compared to those patients without such a code. Patients were less likely to be older (> 75 years:OR 0.70, 95% Cl 0.56-0.87) and were more likely to be from the most deprived areas of Scotland (Quintile 5: OR 2.02, 95% Cl 1.50-2.70) if they refused to attend for review or did not reply to letters asking for attendance at primary care clinics. Patients with multiple co-morbiditieswere more likely to have exclusions for achieving diagnostic clinical targets such as cholesterol control (3 or more co-morbidities: OR 3.37, 95% Cl 2.50-4.50). Conclusion: Scottish practices have appeared to use exception reporting appropriately by excluding patients who are older or have dementia. However, younger or more socio-economically deprived patients were more likely to be recorded as having refused to attend for review or not replying to letters asking for attendance at primary care clinics. It is important for primary care practices to identify and monitor these individuals so that all patients fully benefit from the implementation of an incentive based contract and receive appropriate clinical care to prevent stroke recurrence, further disability and mortality.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
*BRIT MED ASS, FOC EXC REP
[2]  
BROMLEY C., 2005, The Scottish Health Survey 2003
[3]  
Carstairs V., 1991, DEPRIVATION HLTH SCO
[4]   Pay-for-performance programs in family practices in the United Kingdom [J].
Doran, Tim ;
Fullwood, Catherine ;
Gravelle, Hugh ;
Reeves, David ;
Kontopantelis, Evangelos ;
Hiroeh, Urara ;
Roland, Martin .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2006, 355 (04) :375-384
[5]  
HELMS PJ, 2005, BR J CLIN PHARM, V59, P331
[6]  
*ISD SCOTL, QUAL OUTC FRAMW 2005
[7]   Deprivation and volunteering by general practices: cross sectional analysis of a national primary care system [J].
Mackay, D ;
Sutton, M ;
Watt, G .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2005, 331 (7530) :1449-1451
[8]   Deprivation and quality of primary care services: evidence for persistence of the inverse care law from the UK Quality and Outcomes Framework [J].
McLean, G. ;
Sutton, M. ;
Guthrie, B. .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2006, 60 (11) :917-922
[9]  
Sans S, 1997, EUR HEART J, V18, P1231
[10]  
*SCOTT CLIN INF MA, MAK IT WORK YOU