Species divergence and trait convergence in experimental plant community assembly

被引:509
作者
Fukami, T
Bezemer, TM
Mortimer, SR
van der Putten, WH
机构
[1] Netherlands Inst Ecol, NIOO KNAW, Ctr Terr Ecol, NL-6666 ZG Heteren, Netherlands
[2] Landcare Res, Lincoln, New Zealand
[3] Univ Tokyo, Lab Biodivers Sci, Sch Agr & Life Sci, Tokyo 1138657, Japan
[4] Univ Wageningen & Res Ctr, Entomol Lab, NL-6700 ES Wageningen, Netherlands
[5] Univ Wageningen & Res Ctr, Nematol Lab, NL-6700 ES Wageningen, Netherlands
[6] Univ Reading, Dept Agr, Ctr Agrienvironm Res, Reading RG6 6AR, Berks, England
关键词
alternative states; assembly history; assembly rules; community convergence; dispersal limitation; ecological restoration; historical contingency; neutral theory; priority effects; succession;
D O I
10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00829.x
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Despite decades of research, it remains controversial whether ecological communities converge towards a common structure determined by environmental conditions irrespective of assembly history. Here, we show experimentally that the answer depends on the level of community organization considered. In a 9-year grassland experiment, we manipulated initial plant composition on abandoned arable land and subsequently allowed natural colonization. Initial compositional variation caused plant communities to remain divergent in species identities, even though these same communities converged strongly in species traits. This contrast between species divergence and trait convergence could not be explained by dispersal limitation or community neutrality alone. Our results show that the simultaneous operation of trait-based assembly rules and species-level priority effects drives community assembly, making it both deterministic and historically contingent, but at different levels of community organization.
引用
收藏
页码:1283 / 1290
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[2]   Assembly rules within a contingent ecology [J].
Belyea, LR ;
Lancaster, J .
OIKOS, 1999, 86 (03) :402-416
[3]  
Berlow EL, 1997, ECOL MONOGR, V67, P435, DOI 10.1890/0012-9615(1997)067[0435:FCTCHE]2.0.CO
[4]  
2
[5]   Assembly rules and competition in desert rodents [J].
Brown, JH ;
Kelt, DA ;
Fox, BJ .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2002, 160 (06) :815-818
[6]   Community assembly: when should history matter? [J].
Chase, JM .
OECOLOGIA, 2003, 136 (04) :489-498
[7]  
Clements F.E., 1916, PLANT SUCCESSION ANA
[8]   MECHANISMS OF SUCCESSION IN NATURAL COMMUNITIES AND THEIR ROLE IN COMMUNITY STABILITY AND ORGANIZATION [J].
CONNELL, JH ;
SLATYER, RO .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1977, 111 (982) :1119-1144
[9]  
Diamond J.M., 1975, P342
[10]  
Diaz S, 1999, ECOLOGICAL ASSEMBLY, P338, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511542237.013