On different approximations to multilocus identity-by-descent calculations and the resulting power of variance component-based linkage analysis -: art. no. S72

被引:7
作者
Göring, HHH [1 ]
Williams, JT [1 ]
Dyer, TD [1 ]
Blangero, J [1 ]
机构
[1] SW Fdn Biomed Res, Dept Genet, San Antonio, TX 78284 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1186/1471-2156-4-S1-S72
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
An empirical comparison between three different methods for estimation of pair-wise identity-by-descent (IBD) sharing at marker loci was conducted in order to quantify the resulting differences in power and localization precision in variance components-based linkage analysis. On the examined simulated, error-free data set, it was found that an increase in accuracy of allele sharing calculation resulted in an increase in power to detect linkage. Linkage analysis based on approximate multi-marker IBD matrices computed by a Markov chain Monte Carlo approach was much more powerful than linkage analysis based on exact single-marker IBD probabilities. A "multiple two-point" approximation to true "multipoint" IBD computation was found to be roughly intermediate in power. Both multi-marker approaches were similar to each other in accuracy of localization of the quantitative trait locus and far superior to the single-marker approach. The overall conclusions of this study with respect to power are expected to also hold for different data structures and situations, even though the degree of superiority of one approach over another depends on the specific circumstances. It should be kept in mind, however, that an increase in computational accuracy is expected to go hand in hand with a decrease in robustness to various sources of errors.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   Multipoint quantitative-trait linkage analysis in general pedigrees [J].
Almasy, L ;
Blangero, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 1998, 62 (05) :1198-1211
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1951, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH
[3]  
COTTINGHAM RW, 1993, AM J HUM GENET, V53, P252
[4]   GENERAL MODEL FOR GENETIC ANALYSIS OF PEDIGREE DATA [J].
ELSTON, RC ;
STEWART, J .
HUMAN HEREDITY, 1971, 21 (06) :523-&
[5]  
FULKER DW, 1994, AM J HUM GENET, V54, P1092
[6]   Linkage analysis in the presence of errors I:: Complex-valued recombination fractions and complex phenotypes [J].
Göring, HHH ;
Terwilliger, JD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2000, 66 (03) :1095-1106
[7]   Linkage analysis in the presence of errors II:: Marker-locus genotyping errors modeled with hypercomplex recombination fractions [J].
Göring, HHH ;
Terwilliger, JD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2000, 66 (03) :1107-1118
[8]   Linkage analysis in the presence of errors III:: Marker loci and their map as nuisance parameters [J].
Göring, HHH ;
Terwilliger, JD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2000, 66 (04) :1298-1309
[9]   Markov chain Monte Carlo segregation and linkage analysis for oligogenic models [J].
Heath, SC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 1997, 61 (03) :748-760
[10]   EXTENSIONS TO MULTIVARIATE NORMAL-MODELS FOR PEDIGREE ANALYSIS [J].
HOPPER, JL ;
MATHEWS, JD .
ANNALS OF HUMAN GENETICS, 1982, 46 (OCT) :373-383