Object-based attentional selection in scene viewing

被引:176
作者
Nuthmann, Antje [1 ]
Henderson, John M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Dept Psychol, Edinburgh EH8 9JZ, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Univ S Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF VISION | 2010年 / 10卷 / 08期
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
eye movements; naturalistic scenes; objects; fixation locations; preferred viewing location; EYE-MOVEMENT CONTROL; PREVIOUSLY ATTENDED OBJECTS; REAL-WORLD SCENES; VISUAL-ATTENTION; MISLOCATED FIXATIONS; LANDING POSITION; NATURAL SCENES; SALIENCY; MODEL; GAZE;
D O I
10.1167/10.8.20
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Two contrasting views of visual attention in scenes are the visual salience and the cognitive relevance hypotheses. They fundamentally differ in their conceptualization of the visuospatial representation over which attention is directed. According to the saliency model, this representation is image-based, while the cognitive relevance framework advocates an object-based representation. Previous research has shown that (1) viewers prefer to look at objects over background and that (2) the saliency model predicts human fixation locations significantly better than chance. However, it could be that saliency mainly acts through objects. To test this hypothesis, we investigated where people fixate within real objects and saliency proto-objects. To this end, we recorded eye movements of human observers while they inspected photographs of natural scenes under different task instructions. We found a preferred viewing location (PVL) close to the center of objects within naturalistic scenes. Compared to the PVL for real objects, there was less evidence for a PVL for human fixations within saliency proto-objects. There was no evidence for a PVL when only saliency proto-objects that did not spatially overlap with annotated real objects were analyzed. The results suggest that saccade targeting and, by inference, attentional selection in scenes is object-based.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]   High frequency edges (but not contrast) predict where we fixate: A Bayesian system identification analysis [J].
Baddeley, Roland J. ;
Tatler, Benjamin W. .
VISION RESEARCH, 2006, 46 (18) :2824-2833
[2]  
Buswell G.T., 1935, How people look at pictures: a study of the psychology and perception in art
[3]  
Castro Mario, 2009, Proc Am Thorac Soc, V6, P1, DOI 10.1513/pats.200810-116CB
[4]   REDUCING THE INFLUENCE OF NONTARGET STIMULI ON SACCADE ACCURACY - PREDICTABILITY AND LATENCY EFFECTS [J].
COEFFE, C ;
OREGAN, JK .
VISION RESEARCH, 1987, 27 (02) :227-240
[5]   Enhancing scatterplots with smoothed densities [J].
Eilers, PHC ;
Goeman, JJ .
BIOINFORMATICS, 2004, 20 (05) :623-U82
[6]   Objects predict fixations better than early saliency [J].
Einhaeuser, Wolfgang ;
Spain, Merrielle ;
Perona, Pietro .
JOURNAL OF VISION, 2008, 8 (14)
[7]   Interesting objects are visually salient [J].
Elazary, Lior ;
Itti, Laurent .
JOURNAL OF VISION, 2008, 8 (03)
[8]   SWIFT: A dynamical model of saccade generation during reading [J].
Engbert, R ;
Nuthmann, A ;
Richter, EM ;
Kliegl, R .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2005, 112 (04) :777-813
[9]   Self-Consistent Estimation of Mislocated Fixations during Reading [J].
Engbert, Ralf ;
Nuthmann, Antje .
PLOS ONE, 2008, 3 (02)
[10]   How does the purpose of inspection influence the potency of visual salience in scene perception? [J].
Foulsham, Tom ;
Underwood, Geoffrey .
PERCEPTION, 2007, 36 (08) :1123-1138