Bioleaching of heavy metals from anaerobically digested sewage sludge using FeS2 as an energy source

被引:78
作者
Wong, JWC [1 ]
Xiang, L
Gu, XY
Zhou, LX
机构
[1] Hong Kong Baptist Univ, Dept Biol, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Tsinghua Univ, Dept Chem Engn, React Engn Grp, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[3] Nanjing Agr Univ, Coll Life Sci, Dept Microbiol, Nanjing 210095, Peoples R China
[4] Nanjing Agr Univ, Coll Resources & Environm Sci, Dept Environm Engn, Nanjing 210095, Peoples R China
关键词
bioleaching; sludge; heavy metal; pyrite; iron-oxidizing bacteria;
D O I
10.1016/j.chemosphere.2003.11.022
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The effect of using FeS2 as an energy source, on the bioleaching of heavy metals (Zn, Cr, Cu, Pb and Ni) and nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorus) from anaerobically digested sludge using isolated indigenous iron-oxidizing bacteria was investigated in this paper. Addition of FeS2 in the range of 0.5-4.0 gl(-1) accelerated the acidification of sludge and raised the oxidation-reduction potential of sludge medium with an inoculation of 15% (v/v) of active bacteria, thus resulting in an overall increase in metal dissolution efficiency. After 16 days of bioleaching at 28 degreesC and an initial pH of 3.0, up to 99% of Zn, 65% of Cr, 74% of Cu, 58% of Pb and 84% of Ni can be removed from the sludge. In contrast, only 94% of Zn, 12% of Cr, 21% of Cu, 32% of Pb and 38% of Ni were leached out in the control without inoculation of iron-oxidizing bacteria and the addition of FeS2. Less than 15% of nitrogen and 6% of phosphorous were lost after 16 days of bioleaching when using FeS2 as the energy source. Comparing to 39% and 45% loss respectively for these two nutrients when using FeSO(4)(.)7H(2)O as the energy source, FeS2 appears to be a more suitable energy source for preserving nutrients in sludge while removing heavy metals from sludge. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 107
页数:7
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] BEAVERS PD, 1993, AUSTR WAT WAST ASS W, V20, P23
  • [2] BECKETT PHT, 1982, WATER POLLUT CONTROL, V81, P112
  • [3] METALS REMOVAL FROM SEWAGE-SLUDGE BY INDIGENOUS IRON-OXIDIZING BACTERIA
    BLAIS, JF
    TYAGI, RD
    AUCLAIR, JC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND HEALTH PART A-TOXIC/HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 1993, 28 (02): : 443 - 467
  • [4] MAJOR FACTORS INFLUENCING BACTERIAL LEACHING OF HEAVY-METALS (CU AND ZN) FROM ANAEROBIC SLUDGE
    COUILLARD, D
    CHARTIER, M
    MERCIER, G
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 1994, 85 (02) : 175 - 184
  • [5] DAVIS RD, 1987, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V19, P1
  • [6] HUTCHINS SR, 1986, ANNU REV MICROBIOL, V40, P311, DOI 10.1146/annurev.mi.40.100186.001523
  • [7] LEACHING OF HEAVY-METALS FROM ANAEROBIC SEWAGE-SLUDGE BY SULFUR-OXIDIZING BACTERIA
    JAIN, DK
    TYAGI, RD
    [J]. ENZYME AND MICROBIAL TECHNOLOGY, 1992, 14 (05) : 376 - 383
  • [8] LUE HC, 1980, J WAT POLLUT CONTROL, V52, P2538
  • [9] Olsen S. R., 1982, Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties, P403
  • [10] SLUDGE IN AGRICULTURE - THE EUROPEAN APPROACH
    SCHELTINGA, HMJ
    [J]. WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1987, 19 (08) : 9 - 18