Assessing treatment effect heterogeneity in clinical trials with blocked binary outcomes

被引:14
作者
Albert, JM
Gadbury, GL
Mascha, EJ
机构
[1] Case Western Reserve Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[2] Univ Missouri, Dept Math & Stat, Rolla, MO 65409 USA
[3] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Collaborat Biostat Ctr, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
关键词
bounds; causal effects; counterfactuals; potential outcomes; randomized block design; subject-treatment interaction;
D O I
10.1002/bimj.200510157
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
This paper addresses treatment effect heterogeneity (also referred to, more compactly, as 'treatment heterogeneity') in the context of a controlled clinical trial with binary endpoints. Treatment heterogeneity, variation in the true (causal) individual treatment effects, is explored using the concept of the potential outcome. This framework supposes the existance of latent responses for each subject corresponding to each possible treatment. In the context of a binary endpoint, treatment heterogeniety may be represented by the parameter, pi(2), the probability that an individual would have a failure on the experimental treatment, if received, and would have a success on control, if received. Previous research derived bounds for pi(2) based on matched pairs data. The present research extends this method to the blocked data context. Estimates (and their variances) and confidence intervals for the bounds are derived. We apply the new method to data from a renal disease clinical trial. In this example, bounds based on the blocked data are narrower than the corresponding bounds based only on the marginal success proportions. Some remaining challenges (including the possibility of further reducing bound widths) are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:662 / 673
页数:12
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Angrist JD, 1996, J AM STAT ASSOC, V91, P444, DOI 10.2307/2291629
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1989, NEW ENGL J MED, V321, P406
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1989, Applied Linear Regression Models
[4]   Direct effect on validity of response run-in selection in clinical trials [J].
Berger, VW ;
Rezvani, A ;
Makarewicz, VA .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 2003, 24 (02) :156-166
[5]  
Gadbury G L, 2001, J Biopharm Stat, V11, P313, DOI 10.1081/BIP-120008851
[6]   Unit-treatment interaction and its practical consequences [J].
Gadbury, GL ;
Iyer, HK .
BIOMETRICS, 2000, 56 (03) :882-885
[7]   Individual treatment effects in randomized trials with binary outcomes [J].
Gadbury, GL ;
Iyer, HK ;
Albert, JM .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PLANNING AND INFERENCE, 2004, 121 (02) :163-174
[8]   Causal inference in a placebo-controlled clinical trial with binary outcome and ordered compliance [J].
Goetghebeur, E ;
Molenberghs, G .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1996, 91 (435) :928-934
[9]  
HOLLAND PW, 1986, J AM STAT ASSOC, V81, P945, DOI 10.2307/2289064
[10]  
Longford NT, 1999, STAT MED, V18, P1467, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19990630)18:12<1467::AID-SIM149>3.0.CO