A comparative study of different machine learning methods for landslide susceptibility assessment: A case study of Uttarakhand area (India)

被引:397
作者
Binh Thai Pham [1 ,2 ]
Pradhan, Biswajeet [3 ]
Bui, Dieu Tien [4 ]
Prakash, Indra [5 ]
Dholakia, M. B. [6 ]
机构
[1] Gujarat Technol Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Nr Visat Three Rd, Ahmadabad 382424, Gujarat, India
[2] Univ Transport Technol, Dept Geotech Engn, 54 Trieu Khuc, Hanoi, Vietnam
[3] Univ Putra Malaysia, Dept Civil Engn, Fac Engn, GIS RC, Serdang 43400, Selangor Darul, Malaysia
[4] Telemark Univ Coll, Dept Business Adm & Comp Sci, Geog Informat Syst Grp, Hallvard Eikas Plass 1, N-3800 Bo I Telemark, Norway
[5] Govt Gujarat, BISAG, Dept Sci & Technol, Gandhinagar, India
[6] Gujarat Technol Univ, Dept Civil Engn LDCE, Ahmadabad 380015, Gujarat, India
关键词
Landslides susceptibility assessment; Machine learning; Uttarakhand; India; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; EVIDENTIAL BELIEF FUNCTIONS; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORKS; LOGISTIC-REGRESSION; PREDICTION CAPABILITY; BAYESIAN NETWORK; LIKELIHOOD RATIO; MODELS; CLASSIFICATION; DISCRIMINATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.07.005
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Landslide susceptibility assessment of Uttarakhand area of India has been done by applying five machine learning methods namely Support Vector Machines (SVM), Logistic Regression (LR), Fisher's Linear Discriminant Analysis (FLDA), Bayesian Network (BN), and Naive Bayes (NB). Performance of these methods has been evaluated using the ROC curve and statistical index based methods. Analysis and comparison of the results show that all five landslide models performed well for landslide susceptibility assessment (AUC = 0.910-0.950). However, it has been observed that the SVM model (AUC = 0.950) has the best performance in comparison to other landslide models, followed by the LR model (AUC = 0.922), the FLDA model (AUC = 0.921), the BN model (AUC = 0.915), and the NB model (AUC = 0.910), respectively. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:240 / 250
页数:11
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]  
Agarwal N C, 1973, Himalayan Geol, V3, P2
[2]   A comparison of landslide susceptibility maps produced by logistic regression, multi-criteria decision, and likelihood ratio methods: a case study at Izmir, Turkey [J].
Akgun, Aykut .
LANDSLIDES, 2012, 9 (01) :93-106
[3]  
Alexandre-Cortizo E, 2005, EUROCON 2005: THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER AS A TOOL, VOL 1 AND 2 , PROCEEDINGS, P1666
[4]   Application of an evidential belief function model in landslide susceptibility mapping [J].
Althuwaynee, Omar F. ;
Pradhan, Biswajeet ;
Lee, Saro .
COMPUTERS & GEOSCIENCES, 2012, 44 :120-135
[5]   Selection bias in gene extraction on the basis of microarray gene-expression data [J].
Ambroise, C ;
McLachlan, GJ .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2002, 99 (10) :6562-6566
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2014, PROBABILISTIC REASON
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Ph.D. Thesis
[8]  
[Anonymous], INT J APPL
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2006, LANDSLIDE HAZARD RIS
[10]  
[Anonymous], EMOTION RECOGNITION