Row spacing, plant density, and nitrogen effects on corn silage

被引:101
作者
Cox, WJ [1 ]
Cherney, DJR
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Dept Crop & Soil Sci, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
[2] Cornell Univ, Dept Anim Sci, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2134/agronj2001.933597x
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Dairy producers in the northeastern USA who grow corn (Zea maps L,) forage in narrow rows plant at 125 000 plants ha(-1) and fertilize at 225 kg N ha(-1) because they believe narrow-row corn yields best at high plant densities and N rates. We evaluated corn in 1996 and 1997 at two raw spacings (0.38 and 0.76 m), two harvest densities (80 000 and 116 000 plants ha(-1)), and six N rates (0, 50, 100, 150, 200, and 250 kg ha(-1)) to determine if row spacing x plant density x N rate interactions existed for drg matter (DM) and calculated milk yields. No interactions existed for DM yield, forage quality characteristics, and milk yields. Corn had greater DM and milk yields at 0.38-(20.3 and 16.1 Mg ha(-1), respectively) vs. 0.76-m spacing (18.9 and 15.2 Mg ha(-1), respectively). Dry matter and milk yields had quadratic-plus-plateau responses to N rates with maximum yields (20.6 and 17.1 Mg ha(-1), respectively) at an N rate of 150 kg ha(-1). Nitrogen accumulation st harvest, which had a row spacing x N rate interaction, had a linear response to N rates at 0.38-m spacing and a quadratic response at 0.70-m spacing, Dairy farmers in the northeastern USA san produce corn silage at similar plant densities and N fertility, regardless of row spacing, Dairy producers who have excess animal waste could apply slightly more N to narrow-row corn silage because it accumulates more N at harvest.
引用
收藏
页码:597 / 602
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Row spacing effects at different levels of nitrogen availability in maize
    Barbieri, PA
    Rozas, HRS
    Andrade, FH
    Echeverria, HE
    [J]. AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2000, 92 (02) : 283 - 288
  • [2] BYANT HT, 1968, AGRON J, V60, P557
  • [3] COMPARISON OF MODELS FOR DESCRIBING CORN YIELD RESPONSE TO NITROGEN-FERTILIZER
    CERRATO, ME
    BLACKMER, AM
    [J]. AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1990, 82 (01) : 138 - 143
  • [4] Cox WJ, 1998, J PROD AGRIC, V11, P128
  • [5] Corn silage and grain yield responses to plant densities
    Cox, WJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION AGRICULTURE, 1997, 10 (03): : 405 - 410
  • [6] GROWTH, YIELD, AND QUALITY OF FORAGE MAIZE UNDER DIFFERENT NITROGEN MANAGEMENT-PRACTICES
    COX, WJ
    KALONGE, S
    CHERNEY, DJR
    REID, WS
    [J]. AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1993, 85 (02) : 341 - 347
  • [7] Plant density and hybrid influence on corn forage yield and quality
    Cusicanqui, JA
    Lauer, JG
    [J]. AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1999, 91 (06) : 911 - 915
  • [8] DEIBEL J, 1997, P SIL FIELD FEEDST N, P37
  • [9] Marten G.C., 1980, P INT WORKSH STAND A, P61