Risk assessment for 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) based on an epidemiologic study

被引:66
作者
Steenland, K [1 ]
Deddens, J [1 ]
Piacitelli, L [1 ]
机构
[1] NIOSH, Robert A Taft Labs, Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Cincinnati, OH 45226 USA
关键词
carcinogens; dioxins; risk assessment;
D O I
10.1093/aje/154.5.451
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
The International Agency for Research on Cancer (Lyon, France) recently concluded that 2,3,7,8- tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) is a human carcinogen. There have been few human studies and risk assessments with quantitative exposure data. The authors previously conducted exposure-response analyses based on estimated external TCDD exposure for 3,538 US male chemical workers and found a positive trend for all cancer with increasing cumulative exposure. In the present study, 1988 data from 170 workers with both estimated external exposure and known serum TCDD levels were used to derive the relation between the two. This derived relation was used to estimate serum TCDD levels over time for all 3,538 workers, and new dose-response analyses were conducted by using cumulative serum level. A positive trend (p=0.003) was found between estimated log cumulative TCDD serum level and cancer mortality. For males, the excess lifetime (75 years) risk of dying of cancer given a TCDD intake of 1.0 pg/kg of body weight per day, twice the background intake, was an estimated 0.05-0.9% above a background lifetime risk of cancer death of 12.4%. Data from this cohort are consistent with another epidemiologic risk assessment from Germany and support recent conclusions by the US Environmental Protection Agency.
引用
收藏
页码:451 / 458
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Quantitative cancer risk assessment for dioxins using an occupational cohort [J].
Becher, H ;
Steindorf, K ;
Flesch-Janys, D .
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 1998, 106 :663-670
[2]   Estimation of the cumulated exposure to polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins/furans and standardized mortality ratio analysis of cancer mortality by dose in an occupationally exposed cohort [J].
Flesch-Janys, D ;
Steindorf, K ;
Gurn, P ;
Becher, H .
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 1998, 106 :655-662
[3]   MEASURING BENEFIT OF REDUCED EXPOSURE TO ENVIRONMENTAL CARCINOGENS [J].
GAIL, M .
JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1975, 28 (03) :135-147
[4]   REGRESSION-MODELS IN CLINICAL-STUDIES - DETERMINING RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN PREDICTORS AND RESPONSE [J].
HARRELL, FE ;
LEE, KL ;
POLLOCK, BG .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1988, 80 (15) :1198-1202
[5]   OBSERVATIONS ON THE DOSE-RESPONSE CURVE FOR ARSENIC EXPOSURE AND LUNG-CANCER [J].
HERTZPICCIOTTO, I ;
SMITH, AH .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF WORK ENVIRONMENT & HEALTH, 1993, 19 (04) :217-226
[6]   EPIDEMIOLOGY AND QUANTITATIVE RISK ASSESSMENT - A BRIDGE FROM SCIENCE TO POLICY [J].
HERTZPICCIOTTO, I .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1995, 85 (04) :484-491
[7]   QUANTITATIVE RISK ASSESSMENT OF LUNG-CANCER IN UNITED-STATES URANIUM MINERS [J].
HORNUNG, RW ;
MEINHARDT, TJ .
HEALTH PHYSICS, 1987, 52 (04) :417-430
[8]  
IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer), 1997, IARC MON EV CARC RIS, P69
[9]  
Lubin JH, 2000, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V151, P554, DOI 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a010243
[10]  
MICHALEK M, 1996, J TOXICOL ENV HLTH, V47, P209