Measurement of agricultural total factor productivity growth incorporating environmental factors: A nutrients balance approach

被引:192
作者
Viet-Ngu Hoang [1 ]
Coelli, Tim [2 ]
机构
[1] Queensland Univ Technol, Brisbane, Qld 4000, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Environmental efficiency; Environmental productivity; Materials balance; Nutrient efficiency; OECD agriculture; DISTANCE FUNCTION-APPROACH; UNDESIRABLE OUTPUTS; PAPER-INDUSTRY; CANADIAN PULP; FRESH-WATER; EUTROPHICATION; EFFICIENCY; NITROGEN; ECOSYSTEMS; MARINE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jeem.2011.05.009
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
020101 [政治经济学];
摘要
This article proposes to use nutrient-orientated environmental efficiency (EE) measures to construct a nutrient total factor productivity index (NTFP). Since nutrient-orientated EE measures are consistent with the materials balance principle, NTFP index is superior to other existing TFP indexes. An empirical study on the environmental performance of an agricultural sector in 30 OECD countries from 1990 to 2003 yielded several important findings. First, these countries should be able to produce current outputs with at least 50% less aggregate eutrophying power, implying that they should have been able to substantially reduce the potential for eutrophication. Second, traditional TFP has grown by 1.6% per annum due to technical progress; however, there are lags in the responses of several countries to this technical progress. Third, environmental TFP has grown at a slower rate than traditional TFP growth due to reductions in nutrient-orientated allocative efficiency. Finally, changes in input combinations could have significantly improved environmental efficiency and productivity. These findings favor policy interventions and faster technological transfer to improve environmental performance. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:462 / 474
页数:13
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]
Nitrogen and Phosphorus Limitation of Phytoplankton Growth in New Zealand Lakes: Implications for Eutrophication Control [J].
Abell, Jonathan M. ;
Oezkundakci, Deniz ;
Hamilton, David P. .
ECOSYSTEMS, 2010, 13 (07) :966-977
[2]
Alston JM, 2010, NAT RES MANAG POLICY, V34, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-0658-8
[3]
Research returns redux: a meta-analysis of the returns to agricultural R&D [J].
Alston, JM ;
Marra, MC ;
Pardey, PG ;
Wyatt, TJ .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2000, 44 (02) :185-215
[4]
[Anonymous], 2008, Environmental Performance of Agriculture in OECD Countries since 1990.
[5]
[Anonymous], 1994, COST REVENUE CONSTRA
[6]
NEW VIEW OF TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE [J].
ATKINSON, AB ;
STIGLITZ, JE .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1969, 79 (315) :573-578
[7]
Ayres R.U., 1995, ENVIRON RESOUR ECON, V6, P207, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF00705980
[8]
Ball V.E., 2000, PRODUCTIVITY US AGR
[9]
Appropriate technology and growth [J].
Basu, S ;
Weil, DN .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1998, 113 (04) :1025-1054
[10]
THE ECONOMIC-THEORY OF INDEX NUMBERS AND THE MEASUREMENT OF INPUT, OUTPUT, AND PRODUCTIVITY [J].
CAVES, DW ;
CHRISTENSEN, LR ;
DIEWERT, WE .
ECONOMETRICA, 1982, 50 (06) :1393-1414