L5/S1 Fusion Rates in Degenerative Spine Surgery A Systematic Review Comparing ALIF, TLIF, and Axial Interbody Arthrodesis

被引:42
作者
Schroeder, Gregory D. [1 ]
Kepler, Christopher K. [1 ]
Millhouse, Paul W. [1 ]
Fleischman, Andrew N. [2 ]
Maltenfort, Mitchell G. [1 ]
Bateman, Dexter K. [2 ]
Vaccaro, Alexander R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Rothman Inst, 925 Chestnut St, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[2] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
来源
CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY | 2016年 / 29卷 / 04期
关键词
ALIF; TLIF; AxiaLIF; L5/S1; fusion; systematic review; 2-YEAR FOLLOW-UP; ANTERIOR LUMBOSACRAL SURGERY; ISTHMIC SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; FORAMINAL STENOSIS; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; LUMBAR SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; POSTERIOR FIXATION; L5-S1; SEGMENT; SHORT-TERM; LONG-TERM;
D O I
10.1097/BSD.0000000000000356
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
100204 [神经病学];
摘要
Study Design: Systematic review. Objective: To determine the fusion rate of an anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF), transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), and axial arthrodesis at the lumbosacral junction in adult patients undergoing surgery for 1- and 2-level degenerative spine conditions. Summary of Background Data: An L5/S1 interbody fusion is a commonly performed procedure for pathology such as spondylolisthesis with stenosis; however, it is unclear if 1 technique leads to superior fusion rates. Materials and Methods: A systematic search of MEDLINE was conducted for literature published between January 1, 1992 and August 17, 2014. All peer-reviewed articles related to the fusion rate of L5/S1 for an ALIF, TLIF, or axial interbody fusion were included. Results: In total, 42 articles and 1507 patients were included in this systematic review. A difference in overall fusion rates was identified, with a rate of 99.2% (range, 96.4%-99.8%) for a TLIF, 97.2% (range, 91.0%-99.2%) for an ALIF, and 90.5% (range, 79.0%-97.0%) for an axial interbody fusion (P = 0.005). In a paired analysis directly comparing fusion techniques, only the difference between a TLIF and an axial interbody fusion was significant. However, when only cases in which bilateral pedicle screws supported the interbody fusion, no statistical difference (P > 0.05) between the 3 techniques was identified. Conclusions: The current literature available to guide the treatment of L5/S1 pathology is poor, but the available data suggest that a high fusion rate can be expected with the use of an ALIF, TLIF, or axial interbody fusion. Any technique-dependent benefit in fusion rate can be eliminated with common surgical modifications such as the use of bilateral pedicle screws.
引用
收藏
页码:150 / 155
页数:6
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]
Short-term outcome of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lytic and degenerative spondylolisthesis [J].
Ali, Yousuf ;
Najmus-Sakeb ;
Rahman, Muhibbur ;
Mhamud, Salauddin .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2012, 20 (03) :371-374
[2]
Does Minimally Invasive Transsacral Fixation Provide Anterior Column Support in Adult Scoliosis? [J].
Anand, Neel ;
Baron, Eli M. ;
Khandehroo, Babak .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2014, 472 (06) :1769-1775
[3]
[Anonymous], 2014, LEVELS EVIDENCE PRIM
[4]
Percutaneous axial lumbar interbody fusion (axiaLIF) of the L5-S1 segment: Initial clinical and radiographic experience [J].
Aryan, H. E. ;
Newman, C. B. ;
Gold, J. J. ;
Acosta, F. L., Jr. ;
Coover, C. ;
Ames, C. P. .
MINIMALLY INVASIVE NEUROSURGERY, 2008, 51 (04) :225-230
[5]
Stand-alone anterior lumbar discectomy and fusion with plate: initial experience [J].
Aryan, Henry E. ;
Lu, Daniel C. ;
Acosta, Frank L. ;
Ames, Christopher P. .
SURGICAL NEUROLOGY, 2007, 68 (01) :7-13
[6]
Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Degenerative Disk Disease and Spondylolisthesis Grade I Minimally Invasive Versus Open Surgery [J].
Brodano, Giovanni B. ;
Martikos, Konstantinos ;
Lolli, Francesco ;
Gasbarrini, Alessandro ;
Cioni, Alfredo ;
Bandiera, Stefano ;
Di Silvestre, Mario ;
Boriani, Stefano ;
Greggi, Tiziana .
JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2015, 28 (10) :E559-E564
[7]
Surgical treatment of recurrent lumbar disc herniation by transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion [J].
Chen, Zhiming ;
Zhao, Jie ;
Liu, AiGang ;
Yuan, Jiandong ;
Li, Zhonghai .
INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2009, 33 (01) :197-201
[8]
Short-term and long-term outcomes of minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions: is there a difference? [J].
Cheng, Jason S. ;
Park, Priscilla ;
Le, Hai ;
Reisner, Lori ;
Chou, Dean ;
Mummaneni, Praveen V. .
NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2013, 35 (02)
[9]
Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Stand-Alone Interbody Cage in Treatment of Lumbar Intervertebral Foraminal Stenosis : Comparative Study of Two Different Types of Cages [J].
Cho, Chul-Bum ;
Ryu, Kyeong-Sik ;
Park, Chun-Kun .
JOURNAL OF KOREAN NEUROSURGICAL SOCIETY, 2010, 47 (05) :352-357
[10]
Anterior lumbar interbody fusion in patients with a previous discectomy - Minimum 2-year follow-up [J].
Choi, JY ;
Choi, YW ;
Sung, KH .
JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2005, 18 (04) :347-352