Comprehensive evaluation of ARMA-GARCH(-M) approaches for modeling the mean and volatility of wind speed

被引:171
作者
Liu, Heping [1 ]
Erdem, Ergin [1 ]
Shi, Jing [1 ]
机构
[1] N Dakota State Univ, Dept Ind & Mfg Engn, Fargo, ND 58108 USA
关键词
Wind speed; Forecasting; ARMA; GARCH; GARCH-M; AUTOREGRESSIVE CONDITIONAL HETEROSCEDASTICITY; TIME-VARYING TURBULENCE; SERIES ANALYSIS; MARKETS;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.09.028
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Accurately modeling the mean and volatility of wind speed can be beneficial to effective wind energy utilization. For this purpose, this paper evaluates the effectiveness of autoregressive moving average-generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity (ARMA-GARCH) approaches for modeling the mean and volatility of wind speed. Five different GARCH approaches are included, and each consists of an original form and a modified form, GARCH-in-mean (GARCH-M). As a result, 10 different model structures are evaluated, based on the 7-year hourly wind speed data collected at four different heights from an observation site in Colorado, USA. Multiple evaluation methods of modeling sufficiency are used. The results show that the ARMA-GARCH(-M) approaches can effectively catch the trend change of the mean and volatility of wind speed. Also, the volatility of wind speed has the nonlinear and asymmetric time-varying feature, and the ARMA-GARCH-M structures can consistently improve the modeling sufficiency of mean wind speed. As the height increases, the explanatory power of all ARMA-GARCH(-M) models slightly deteriorates. On the other hand, no single model structure outperforms the others at all heights, and this confirms that for any wind speed dataset, the potential models should be evaluated to find the most appropriate one for the highest modeling sufficiency. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:724 / 732
页数:9
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
Akaike H., 1973, 2 INT S INFORM THEOR, P267
[2]   Short-term forecasting of wind speed and related electrical power [J].
Alexiadis, MC ;
Dikopoulos, PS ;
Sahsamanoglou, HS ;
Manousaridis, IM .
SOLAR ENERGY, 1998, 63 (01) :61-68
[3]  
*AM WIND EN ASS, 2010 YEAR END 2009 M
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2009, PHYS APPROACH SHORT
[5]   GENERALIZED AUTOREGRESSIVE CONDITIONAL HETEROSKEDASTICITY [J].
BOLLERSLEV, T .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 1986, 31 (03) :307-327
[6]   TESTING FOR AUTOCORRELATION IN DYNAMIC LINEAR-MODELS [J].
BREUSCH, TS .
AUSTRALIAN ECONOMIC PAPERS, 1978, 17 (31) :334-355
[7]   Wind speed forecasting in the South Coast of Oaxaca, Mexico [J].
Cadenas, Erasmo ;
Rivera, Wilfrido .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2007, 32 (12) :2116-2128
[8]   GARCH 101: The use of ARCH/GARCH models in applied econometrics [J].
Engle, R .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2001, 15 (04) :157-168
[9]   AUTOREGRESSIVE CONDITIONAL HETEROSCEDASTICITY WITH ESTIMATES OF THE VARIANCE OF UNITED-KINGDOM INFLATION [J].
ENGLE, RF .
ECONOMETRICA, 1982, 50 (04) :987-1007
[10]   MEASURING AND TESTING THE IMPACT OF NEWS ON VOLATILITY [J].
ENGLE, RF ;
NG, VK .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1993, 48 (05) :1749-1778