Impact of interlayer on moisture characteristics of reclaimed soil backfilled with Yellow River sediments

被引:11
作者
Wang, Xiaotong [1 ]
Hu, Zhenqi [1 ,2 ]
Liang, Yusheng [1 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Min & Technol Beijing, Inst Land Reclamat & Ecol Restorat, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[2] China Univ Min & Technol, China Coll Environm Sci & Spatial Informat, Xuzhou 221116, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
land reclamation; Mining subsidence; Yellow River sediment; multi-layered soil reconstructed; moisture characteristics; INFILTRATION; EVAPORATION; LAND; FLOW;
D O I
10.25165/j.ijabe.20201301.5418
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
082806 [农业信息与电气工程];
摘要
Underground coal mining causes land subsidence, and backfilling with Yellow River sediment is an effective reclamation technology to restore farmland in China. To date, two-layer soil reconstructed (TSR) for subsided land reclamation resulted in poor capacity to retain water. To solve this problem, multi-layered soil reconstructed (MSR), sandwiching soil interlayers between sediment, was developed as a new reclamation strategy with Yellow River sediment. In order to evaluate the impact of soil interlayer on moisture characteristics, laboratory experiments of infiltration and evaporation were conducted. Two control treatments (CK1, CK2) and four experimental treatments (T1-T4) were designed. CK1 was undamaged farmland, CK2 was conventional reconstructed two-layers soil profile (filled sediment with 40 cm soil cover). T1-T4 were multiple-layers soil profiles sandwiching different structures of soil interlayers between sediment layers. The results indicated that putting interlayers into sediment reduced water leakage and water evaporation, improved the water-holding capacity of conventional two-layer soil profiles. The total thickness of soil interlayers of 30 cm (T3 and T4) was better than 20 cm (T1 and T2) and two soil interlayers (T2) were better than one (T1) on water-holding capacity. Furthermore, the best reconstructed soil profile was T3, sandwiched two soil interlayer and the first thickness was 20 cm. This treatment had the greatest improvement on soil water holding capacity with an increase of 49.14% compared to CK2 at the end of the evaporation and was closest to CK1 (402.31 mm). This study provided experimental evidence that compares with TSR, MRS improved the moisture characteristics of backfilling with Yellow River sediment.
引用
收藏
页码:153 / 159
页数:7
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]
Investigation of hydrogeologic processes in a dipping layer structure: 1. The flow barrier effect [J].
Alfnes, E ;
Kinzelbach, W ;
Aagaard, P .
JOURNAL OF CONTAMINANT HYDROLOGY, 2004, 69 (3-4) :157-172
[2]
[Anonymous], 1998, ENV SOIL PHYS FUNDAM
[3]
[甘永德 Gan Yongde], 2012, [水土保持学报, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation], V26, P217
[4]
Temporal stability of soil water storage in diverse soil layers [J].
Gao, Lei ;
Shao, Mingan .
CATENA, 2012, 95 :24-32
[5]
Impacts of fly-ash on soil and plant responses [J].
Gupta, DK ;
Rai, UN ;
Tripathi, RD ;
Inouhe, M .
JOURNAL OF PLANT RESEARCH, 2002, 115 (1122) :401-409
[6]
A DESCRIPTIVE-THEORY OF FINGERING DURING INFILTRATION INTO LAYERED SOILS [J].
HILLEL, D ;
BAKER, RS .
SOIL SCIENCE, 1988, 146 (01) :51-56
[7]
Hu Z Q, 2008, LAND RECLAMATION ECO
[8]
Optimal Thickness of Soil Cover for Reclaiming Subsided Land with Yellow River Sediments [J].
Hu, Zhenqi ;
Duo, Linghua ;
Shao, Fang .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (11)
[9]
Reclaiming subsided land with Yellow River sediments: Evaluation of soil-sediment columns [J].
Hu, Zhenqi ;
Shao, Fang ;
McSweeney, Kevin .
GEODERMA, 2017, 307 :210-219
[10]
Farmland damage and its impact on the overlapped areas of cropland and coal resources in the eastern plains of China [J].
Hu, Zhenqi ;
Yang, Guanghua ;
Xiao, Wu ;
Li, Jing ;
Yang, Yaoqi ;
Yu, Yang .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2014, 86 :1-8