Relative efficacy of a brief motivational intervention for college student drinkers

被引：176

作者：

Murphy, JG ^{[1
]}

Duchnick, JJ ^{[1
]}

Vuchinich, RE ^{[1
]}

Davison, JW ^{[1
]}

Karg, RS ^{[1
]}

Olson, AM ^{[1
]}

Smith, AF ^{[1
]}

Coffey, TT ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Auburn Univ, Dept Psychol, Auburn, AL 36849 USA

来源：

PSYCHOLOGY OF ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS | 2001年 / 15卷 / 04期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1037/0893-164X.15.4.373

中图分类号：

R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];

学科分类号：

摘要：

The authors evaluated the efficacy of Brief Alcohol Screening and Intervention for College Students (BASICS; L. A. Dimeff, J. S. Baer, D. R. Kivlahan, & G. A. Marlatt, 1999), a single session of drinking-related feedback intended to reduce heavy drinking and related harm. College student drinkers (N = 99) were assigned to BASICS, an educational intervention, or an assessment-only control group. At 3 months postintervention, there were no overall significant group differences, but heavier drinking BASICS participants showed greater reductions in weekly alcohol consumption and binge drinking than did heavier drinking control and education participants. At 9 months, heavier drinking BASICS participants again showed the largest effect sizes. BASICS participants evaluated the intervention more favorably than did education participants. This study suggests that BASICS may be more efficacious than educational interventions for heavier drinking college students.

引用

页码：373 / 379

页数：7

共 16 条

[1]

[Anonymous], 2013, Motivational Interviewing: Helping People Change, 3rd Edn

[2] AN EXPERIMENTAL TEST OF 3 METHODS OF ALCOHOL RISK REDUCTION WITH YOUNG-ADULTS [J].