Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma related to gravitational challenge: systematic review of randomised controlled trials

被引:717
作者
Smith, GCS [1 ]
Pell, JP
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, England
[2] Greater Glasgow NHS Board, Dept Publ Hlth, Glasgow G3 8YU, Lanark, Scotland
来源
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2003年 / 327卷 / 7429期
关键词
D O I
10.1136/bmj.327.7429.1459
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives To determine whether parachutes are effective in preventing major trauma related to gravitational challenge. Design Systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Data sources: Medline, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases; appropriate internet sites and citation lists. Study selection: Studies showing the effects of using a parachute during free fall. Main outcome measure Death or major trauma, defined as an injury severity score > 15. Results We were unable to identify any randomiscd controlled trials of parachute intervention. Conclusions As with many interventions intended to prevent ill health, the effectiveness of parachutes has not been subjected to rigorous evaluation by using randomised controlled trials. Advocates of evidence based medicine have criticised the adoption of interventions evaluated by using only observational data. We think that everyone might benefit if the most radical protagonists of evidence based medicine organised and participated in a double blind, randomised, placebo controlled, crossover trial of the parachute.
引用
收藏
页码:1459 / 1461
页数:3
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] Belmont PJ, 2001, J TRAUMA, V50, P855
  • [2] Military parachuting injuries: a literature review
    Bricknell, MCM
    Craig, SC
    [J]. OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE-OXFORD, 1999, 49 (01): : 17 - 26
  • [3] CUNNINGHAM A, 2002, GUINNESS WORLDS RECO
  • [4] An unusual airplane crash-deadly life saver unintentional activation of an automated reserve opening device causing airplane accident
    Lasczkowski, G
    Hasenfuss, S
    Verhoff, M
    Weiler, G
    [J]. FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2002, 125 (2-3) : 250 - 253
  • [5] Parachuting for charity: is it worth the money? A 5-year audit of parachute injuries in Tayside and the cost to the NHS
    Lee, CT
    Williams, P
    Hadden, WA
    [J]. INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 1999, 30 (04): : 283 - 287
  • [6] Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: systematic review
    Lexchin, J
    Bero, LA
    Djulbegovic, B
    Clark, O
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 326 (7400): : 1167 - 1170B
  • [7] Reporting data following major trauma and analysing factors associated with outcome using the new Utstein style recommendations
    Lossius, HM
    Langhelle, A
    Reide, ES
    Pillgram-Larsen, J
    Lossius, TA
    Laake, P
    Steen, PA
    [J]. RESUSCITATION, 2001, 50 (03) : 263 - 272
  • [8] Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement
    Moher, D
    Cook, DJ
    Eastwood, S
    Olkin, I
    Rennie, D
    Stroup, DF
    [J]. LANCET, 1999, 354 (9193) : 1896 - 1900
  • [9] Hormone replacement therapy and cardioprotection: Basic concepts and clinical considerations
    Pines, A
    Mijatovic, V
    vanderMooren, MJ
    Kenemans, P
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 1997, 71 (02): : 193 - 197
  • [10] Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women - Principal results from the Women's Health Initiative randomized controlled trial
    Rossouw, JE
    Anderson, GL
    Prentice, RL
    LaCroix, AZ
    Kooperberg, C
    Stefanick, ML
    Jackson, RD
    Beresford, SAA
    Howard, BV
    Johnson, KC
    Kotchen, JM
    Ockene, J
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 288 (03): : 321 - 333