A method for evaluating exposure to nitrous oxides by application of lognormal distribution

被引:1
作者
Borjanovic, SS
Djordjevic, SV
Vukovic-Pal, MD
机构
[1] Inst Occupat Hlth Dr Dragomir Karajovic, Dept Work Physiol, YU-11000 Belgrade, Yugoslavia
[2] Inst Occupat Hlth Dr Dragomir Karajovic, Dept Occupat Hyg, YU-11000 Belgrade, Yugoslavia
关键词
Gaussian distribution; geometric mean; confidence interval; geometric standard deviation; fit tests;
D O I
10.1539/joh.41.27
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
A lognormal distribution adequately describes exposure to nitrous oxides in a work environment. The aim of this paper was to assign to the measured data a certain degree of variability which defines the interval in which real concentrations can be found with a given probability. Exposures may be evaluated by using estimates of the geometric mean (GM) and the geometric standard deviation (GSD), i.e. central value and dispersion index, to calculate the confidence interval (CI) around the mean exposure and compare this interval to the occupational exposure limit. The concentration of nitrous oxides (114 random temporal measurements covering all three shifts, during 6 consecutive days) on coated electrode welding in a car manufacturing plant, was determined with colourimetric direct reading method. Statistical analysis (chi-square and Kolmogorov-Smirnov goodness of fit tests, lognormal and Gaussian distribution fitting and Q-Q plots) was performed. The distribution of the nitrous oxides concentration in the work environment studied closely resembled that of lognormal distribution. The geometric mean was 4.098 mg/m(3), median 4.00 mg/m(3), geometric standard deviation 1.829 and 95% confidence interval 3.66-4.58 mg/m(3). It is possible to apply the computed GSD for evaluation of exposure limits to nitrous oxides in any other work environment, even with only a few measurements.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 32
页数:6
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] BORRONI A, 1980, MED LAVORO, V73, P412
  • [2] BURINGH E, 1991, AM IND HYG ASSOC J, V52, P6, DOI 10.1080/15298669191364244
  • [3] WORKPLACE EXPOSURE ZONES FOR CLASSIFICATION OF EMPLOYEE EXPOSURES TO PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL AGENTS
    CORN, M
    ESMEN, NA
    [J]. AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 1979, 40 (01): : 47 - 57
  • [4] *DRAG AKT, 1994, DRAG RORCH HDB BOD W, P380
  • [5] *FED STAND I, 1991, YUGOSLAV OFFICIAL RE, V54, P1
  • [6] EVALUATION OF THE TIME WEIGHTED AVERAGE OF AIR CONTAMINANTS WITH SPECIAL REFERENCES TO CONCENTRATION FLUCTUATION AND BIOLOGICAL HALF TIME
    KOIZUMI, A
    SEKIGUCHI, T
    KONNO, M
    IKEDA, M
    [J]. AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 1980, 41 (10): : 693 - 699
  • [7] FLUCTUATIONS OF OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE INDEXES TO MIXTURES
    KUMAGAI, S
    MATSUNAGA, I
    [J]. ANNALS OF OCCUPATIONAL HYGIENE, 1992, 36 (02) : 131 - 143
  • [8] Balancing cost and precision in exposure assessment studies
    Lemasters, GK
    Shukla, R
    Li, YD
    Lockey, JE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 1996, 38 (01) : 39 - 45
  • [9] *NIOSH, 1974, MAN AN METH
  • [10] RAPPAPORT SM, 1987, AM IND HYG ASSOC J, V48, P374