Performance of macrolichens and lichen genera as indicators of lichen species richness and composition

被引:69
作者
Bergamini, A
Scheidegger, C
Stofer, S
Carvalho, P
Davey, S
Dietrich, M
Dubs, F
Farkas, E
Groner, U
Kärkkäinen, K
Keller, C
Lökös, L
Lommi, S
Máguas, C
Mitchell, R
Pinho, P
Rico, VJ
Aragón, G
Truscott, AM
Wolseley, P
Watt, A
机构
[1] Swiss Fed Res Inst WSL, CH-8903 Birmensdorf, Switzerland
[2] Museu Nacl Hist Nat, Jardim Bot, P-1250102 Lisbon, Portugal
[3] Stable Flat, Hassocks BN6 8UR, Sussex, England
[4] Natl Univ Ireland Univ Coll Dublin, Dept Zool, Dublin 4, Ireland
[5] I de Bode, CH-6010 Kriens, Switzerland
[6] Univ Paris 06, Ctr Ile France, IRD, F-93143 Bondy, France
[7] Univ Paris 07, Ctr Ile France, IRD, F-93143 Bondy, France
[8] Univ Paris 12, Ctr Ile France, IRD, F-93143 Bondy, France
[9] Hungarian Acad Sci, Inst Ecol & Bot, H-2163 Vacratot, Hungary
[10] Univ Helsinki, Dept Systemat & Ecol, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland
[11] Hungarian Nat Hist Museum, Dept Bot, H-1476 Budapest, Hungary
[12] Finnish Forest Res Inst, Vantaa Res Ctr, Vantaa 01301, Finland
[13] FCUL, Ctr Ecol & Biol Vegetal, Dept Biol Vegetal, P-1749016 Lisbon, Portugal
[14] Ctr Ecol & Hydrol, Banchory AB31 4BW, Aberdeen, Scotland
[15] Univ Complutense Madrid, Fac Farm, Dept Biol Vegetal 2, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
[16] Nat Hist Museum, Dept Bot, London SW7 5BD, England
关键词
biodiversity indicator; crustose lichens; land-use intensity; species composition;
D O I
10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00086.x
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
In the search for cost-effective methods for measuring and monitoring lichen diversity, we tested the performance of two possible indicators: lichen genus diversity and macrolichen diversity. We studied the lichen vegetation of eight European countries situated in six different biogeographic regions. In each country, six land-use units (each 1 km(2)) representing a land-use gradient ranging from old-growth forest to farmland were sampled (n=48) for terricolous, saxicolous, and epiphytic lichens at 16 plots each. We found 768 different lichen species belonging to 157 genera. Relationships between richness and density of genera and species, species and macrolichens, and crustose lichens and macrolichens were highly significant (p<0.001) for all substrates combined and for epiphytic and saxicolous lichens. Richness and density of genera and macrolichens explained a large amount. of variation of the species richness and density (R(2): 71.9%-98.0%). The relationship between crustose lichens and macrolichens explained less of the variation (R(2): 37.7%-70.1%). Effects of land-use intensity on the richness and density of genera, species, and crustose lichens were similar, except for a strong difference between the forested and the more open land-use units for epiphytic crustose lichens. For epiphytic macrolichens there were fewer significant effects. Detrended correspondence analysis indicated similar ordering of sites along the major gradients and similar length of these gradients for genera, species, macrolichens, and crustose lichens. Both genera and macrolichens are useful indicators of total lichen species richness and density. Macrolichens, however, are more suitable indicators than genera owing to (1) their more stable taxonomy of species than of genera, (2) the potential that nonspecialists could do the sampling, (3) the limited use of genera data for species conservation, and (4) the fact that species extinctions will not be indicated by nonmonotypic genera.
引用
收藏
页码:1051 / 1062
页数:12
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   MEASURING MORE OF BIODIVERSITY - GENUS RICHNESS AS A SURROGATE FOR SPECIES RICHNESS IN AUSTRALIAN ANT FAUNAS [J].
ANDERSEN, AN .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 1995, 73 (01) :39-43
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, IUCN red list categories and criteria
[3]   Testing the higher-taxon approach to conservation planning in a megadiverse group: the macrofungi [J].
Balmford, A ;
Lyon, AJE ;
Lang, RM .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2000, 93 (02) :209-217
[4]   PREDICTING THE SPECIES RICHNESS OF NEOTROPICAL FOREST BUTTERFLIES - ITHOMIINAE (LEPIDOPTERA, NYMPHALIDAE) AS INDICATORS [J].
BECCALONI, GW ;
GASTON, KJ .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 1995, 71 (01) :77-86
[5]   Higher taxa surrogates of spider (Araneae) diversity and their efficiency in conservation [J].
Cardoso, P ;
Silva, I ;
de Oliveira, NG ;
Serrano, ARM .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2004, 117 (04) :453-459
[6]  
Colwell R.K., 2000, EstimateS: statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples software and user's guide
[7]  
Dietrich M, 1996, LICHENOLOGIST, V28, P245
[8]  
Dietrich M, 1997, LICHENOLOGIST, V29, P237
[9]   In search of the best correlates for local organismal biodiversity in cultivated areas [J].
Duelli, P ;
Obrist, MK .
BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 1998, 7 (03) :297-309
[10]  
European Commission, 2001, ENV 2010 OUR FUT OUR