Objective Video Quality Assessment Methods: A Classification, Review, and Performance Comparison

被引:421
作者
Chikkerur, Shyamprasad [1 ]
Sundaram, Vijay [1 ]
Reisslein, Martin [1 ]
Karam, Lina J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Sch Elect Comp & Energy Engn, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Full-reference metric; objective video quality; perceptual video quality; reduced-reference metric; REFERENCE IMAGE; INFORMATION; MODEL; IPTV;
D O I
10.1109/TBC.2011.2104671
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
With the increasing demand for video-based applications, the reliable prediction of video quality has increased in importance. Numerous video quality assessment methods and metrics have been proposed over the past years with varying computational complexity and accuracy. In this paper, we introduce a classification scheme for full-reference and reduced-reference media-layer objective video quality assessment methods. Our classification scheme first classifies a method according to whether natural visual characteristics or perceptual (human visual system) characteristics are considered. We further subclassify natural visual characteristics methods into methods based on natural visual statistics or natural visual features. We subclassify perceptual characteristics methods into frequency-or pixel-domain methods. According to our classification scheme, we comprehensively review and compare the media-layer objective video quality models for both standard resolution and high definition video. We find that the natural visual statistics based MultiScale-Structural SIMilarity index (MS-SSIM), the natural visual feature based Video Quality Metric (VQM), and the perceptual spatio-temporal frequency-domain based MOtion-based Video Integrity Evaluation (MOVIE) index give the best performance for the LIVE Video Quality Database.
引用
收藏
页码:165 / 182
页数:18
相关论文
共 96 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000, VQEG FRTV PHASE 1 DA
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, DCT BASED VIDEO QUAL
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2000ITUT STUD GROUP
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2010, VIS NETW IND GLOB MO
[5]  
[Anonymous], FIN REP VID QUAL EXP
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2008, SUBJECTIVE VIDEO QUA
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2011, OBJ PERC MULT VID QU
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2000, 8WP212 ITUT STUD GRO
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Final report from the video quality experts group on the validation of objective models of video quality assessment
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2000, US REQ OBJ PERC VID