Ecological statistics of Gestalt laws for the perceptual organization of contours

被引:235
作者
Elder, James H. [1 ]
Goldberg, Richard M. [2 ]
机构
[1] York Univ, Ctr Vis Res, Toronto, ON M3J 2R7, Canada
[2] IBM Canada Ltd, User Centred Design Lab, Toronto, ON, Canada
来源
JOURNAL OF VISION | 2002年 / 2卷 / 04期
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
perceptual organization; computational modeling; natural image statistics; image coding; contours; edges; proximity; good continuation; similarity;
D O I
10.1167/2.4.5
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Although numerous studies have measured the strength of visual grouping cues for controlled psychophysical stimuli, little is known about the statistical utility of these various cues for natural images. In this study, we conducted experiments in which human participants trace perceived contours in natural images. These contours are automatically mapped to sequences of discrete tangent elements detected in the image. By examining relational properties between pairs of successive tangents on these traced curves, and between randomly selected pairs of tangents, we are able to estimate the likelihood distributions required to construct an optimal Bayesian model for contour grouping. We employed this novel methodology to investigate the inferential power of three classical Gestalt cues for contour grouping: proximity, good continuation, and luminance similarity. The study yielded a number of important results: (1) these cues, when appropriately defined, are approximately uncorrelated, suggesting a simple factorial model for statistical inference; (2) moderate image-to-image variation of the statistics indicates the utility of general probabilistic models for perceptual organization; (3) these cues differ greatly in their inferential power, proximity being by far the most powerful; and (4) statistical modeling of the proximity cue indicates a scale-invariant power law in close agreement with prior psychophysics.
引用
收藏
页码:324 / 353
页数:30
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]  
ALTER TD, 1995, DISS ABSTR INT, V56, P3844
[2]   WHAT DOES THE RETINA KNOW ABOUT NATURAL SCENES [J].
ATICK, JJ ;
REDLICH, AN .
NEURAL COMPUTATION, 1992, 4 (02) :196-210
[3]   SOME INFORMATIONAL ASPECTS OF VISUAL PERCEPTION [J].
ATTNEAVE, F .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1954, 61 (03) :183-193
[4]  
Barlow H. B., 1961, P331
[5]   EFFICIENCY OF DETECTING CHANGES OF DENSITY IN RANDOM DOT PATTERNS [J].
BARLOW, HB .
VISION RESEARCH, 1978, 18 (06) :637-650
[6]  
BECK J, 1989, Spatial Vision, V4, P75, DOI 10.1163/156856889X00068
[7]   ECOLOGICAL CUE-VALIDITY OF PROXIMITY AND OF OTHER GESTALT FACTORS [J].
BRUNSWIK, E ;
KAMIYA, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1953, 66 (01) :20-32
[8]   APPLICATION OF FOURIER ANALYSIS TO VISIBILITY OF GRATINGS [J].
CAMPBELL, FW ;
ROBSON, JG .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1968, 197 (03) :551-&
[9]   EVALUATING A COMPUTATIONAL MODEL OF PERCEPTUAL GROUPING BY PROXIMITY [J].
COMPTON, BJ ;
LOGAN, GD .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1993, 53 (04) :403-421
[10]   A BAYESIAN MULTIPLE-HYPOTHESIS APPROACH TO EDGE GROUPING AND CONTOUR SEGMENTATION [J].
COX, IJ ;
REHG, JM ;
HINGORANI, S .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER VISION, 1993, 11 (01) :5-24