Predicted values of propofol EC50 and sevoflurane concentration for insertion of laryngeal mask Classic™ and ProSeal™
被引:37
作者:
Kodaka, M
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Saitama Med Sch, Saitama Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, Kawagoe, Saitama 3508550, JapanSaitama Med Sch, Saitama Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, Kawagoe, Saitama 3508550, Japan
Kodaka, M
[1
]
Okamoto, Y
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Saitama Med Sch, Saitama Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, Kawagoe, Saitama 3508550, JapanSaitama Med Sch, Saitama Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, Kawagoe, Saitama 3508550, Japan
Okamoto, Y
[1
]
Koyama, K
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Saitama Med Sch, Saitama Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, Kawagoe, Saitama 3508550, JapanSaitama Med Sch, Saitama Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, Kawagoe, Saitama 3508550, Japan
Koyama, K
[1
]
Miyao, H
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Saitama Med Sch, Saitama Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, Kawagoe, Saitama 3508550, JapanSaitama Med Sch, Saitama Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, Kawagoe, Saitama 3508550, Japan
Miyao, H
[1
]
机构:
[1] Saitama Med Sch, Saitama Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, Kawagoe, Saitama 3508550, Japan
Background. A new laryngeal mask airway, the ProSeal(TM) (PLMA), is said to be more difficult to insert than the laryngeal mask airway Classic(TM) (CLMA) using propofol anaesthesia. Therefore, we expected a greater dose of propofol and sevoflurane to be required to insert the PLMA compared with the CLMA. We determined the effective concentration 50% (EC50) of propofol and end-tidal sevoflurane to allow insertion of the PLMA and the CLMA. Methods. Seventy-six elective female patients (aged 20-60 yr and ASA I-II) were randomly assigned to one of four groups. Either a PLMA or a CLMA was inserted using either propofol target controlled infusion or sevoflurane. Both propofol and sevoflurane targets were determined with a modified Dixon's up-and-down method. After equilibration between the predetermined blood and effect site concentrations, which had been held steady for more than 10 min, LMA insertion was attempted without neuromuscular block. Results. The predicted EC50CLMA and EC50PLMA for propofol were 3.14 (0.33) and 4.32 (0.67) mug ml(-1). E'(CLMA) and E'(PLMA) of sevoflurane (mean (SD)) were 2.36 (0.22) and 2.82 (0.45)% (P<0.01 and 0.05, respectively). Conclusions. The estimated concentration of propofol and the sevoflurane concentration needed to allow insertion of the ProSeal(TM) are respectively 38 and 20% greater than those needed for insertion of the Classic LMA.
机构:
Ewha Womans Univ, Tong Dae Mun Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Coll Med, Seoul 110126, South KoreaEwha Womans Univ, Tong Dae Mun Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Coll Med, Seoul 110126, South Korea
Kim, JH
;
Lee, CH
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Ewha Womans Univ, Tong Dae Mun Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Coll Med, Seoul 110126, South KoreaEwha Womans Univ, Tong Dae Mun Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Coll Med, Seoul 110126, South Korea
机构:
Ewha Womans Univ, Tong Dae Mun Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Coll Med, Seoul 110126, South KoreaEwha Womans Univ, Tong Dae Mun Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Coll Med, Seoul 110126, South Korea
Kim, JH
;
Lee, CH
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Ewha Womans Univ, Tong Dae Mun Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Coll Med, Seoul 110126, South KoreaEwha Womans Univ, Tong Dae Mun Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Coll Med, Seoul 110126, South Korea