Effect of four levels of water application on grape composition and midday stem water potential of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Cabernet Sauvignon

被引:7
作者
Ortega-Farias, S [1 ]
Duarte, M [1 ]
Acevedo, C [1 ]
Moreno, Y [1 ]
Córdova, F [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Talca, Res & Extens Ctr Irrigat & Agroclimatol, CITRA, Fac Ciencias Agr, Talca, Chile
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE IVTH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON IRRIGATION OF HORTICULTURAL CROPS | 2004年 / 664期
关键词
vine water status; stem water potential; grape quality; irrigation scheduling;
D O I
10.17660/ActaHortic.2004.664.62
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
An experiment was carried out to study the effect of four level of water applications on grape composition and midday stem water potential of a ribs vinifera L. cv. 'Cabernet Sauvignon' vineyard, located in the Pencahue Valley, Maule Region of Chile (35 degrees 22' S; 71 degrees 47' W), during the 2001-2002 growing season. The 9 year-old vines were irrigated by drip irrigation and trained on vertical shoot positional system. Levels of water application were: treatment T1 = 100 % of vine evapotranspiration (ET) during set-harvest, treatment T2 = 70 % of ET during fruit set-veraison and 40 % of ET during veraison-harvest; treatment, T3 = 40 % of ET during fruit set-veraison and 70 % of ET during veraison-harvest, and treatment T4 = 40 % of ET during fruit set-harvest. Results indicate that there were not significant differences in soluble solids (SS) and pH among treatments, but total yield was statistically higher in treatment T1 than others treatments. A significant reduction of berry diameter was found in treatments T3 and T4, which presented the highest concentration of total phenols. For this level of water application, midday water potential (Psi(stem)) at veraison was -1.29 MPa for treatment T3 and -1.24 MPa for treatment T4. On the other hand, treatment T1 presented the highest values berry size and the lowest concentration of total phenols and total anthocyanin. In this case, values of midday Psi(stem) ranged between -0.75 MPa and -0.98 MPa from set to harvest.
引用
收藏
页码:491 / 497
页数:7
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1989, IRRIGATION SYSTEM DE
[2]   Stem water potential is a sensitive indicator of grapevine water status [J].
Chone, X ;
van Leeuwen, C ;
Dubourdieu, D ;
Gaudillere, JP .
ANNALS OF BOTANY, 2001, 87 (04) :477-483
[3]   Deficit irrigation strategies using midday stem water potential in prune [J].
Lampinen, BD ;
Shackel, KA ;
Southwick, SM ;
Olson, WH .
IRRIGATION SCIENCE, 2001, 20 (02) :47-54
[4]  
MATTHEWS MA, 1987, VITIS, V26, P147
[5]   DEPENDENCE OF WINE SENSORY ATTRIBUTES ON VINE WATER STATUS [J].
MATTHEWS, MA ;
ISHII, R ;
ANDERSON, MM ;
OMAHONY, M .
JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE, 1990, 51 (03) :321-335
[6]  
McCarthy M. G., 1997, Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, V3, P102
[7]   Midday stem water potential as a plant water stress indicator for irrigation scheduling in fruit trees [J].
Naor, A .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRD INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON IRRIGATION OF HORTICULTURAL CROPS, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2000, (537) :447-454
[8]  
Ojeda H, 2001, VITIS, V40, P141
[9]  
ORTEGAFARIAS S, 2003, SITE SPECIFIC MANAGE, P55
[10]  
Peterlunger E., 2002, Rivista di Viticoltura e di Enologia, V55, P51