Comparison between creatinine and cystatin C-based GFR equations in renal transplantation

被引:56
作者
Zahran, Ahmed
Qureshi, Mabood
Shoker, Ahmed
机构
[1] Univ Saskatchewan, Royal Univ Hosp, Dept Med, Div Nephrol, Saskatoon, SK S7N 0W0, Canada
[2] Univ Saskatchewan, Royal Univ Hosp, Dept Pathol, Saskatoon, SK S7N 0W0, Canada
关键词
cystatin C; GFR; renal transplantation; serum creatinine;
D O I
10.1093/ndt/gfm243
中图分类号
R3 [基础医学]; R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1001 ; 1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background. Estimation of glomerular filtration rate ( GFR) from serum creatinine ( S-cr) or cystatin C ( Cys C) exhibit variable performances. Methods. We compared the performances of 14 Scr and 9 Cys C estimated GFR equations using inulin clearance ( Cl-in) as the reference test in 103 stable renal transplant populations. Bias, precision, receiving operation characteristics ( ROC), accuracy within 30% ranges from the reference method and agreements of each test were compared. Results. Mean Clin was 46.4 +/- 20.9 ml/ min/ 1.73 m(2). S-cr and Cys C levels correlated well with each other ( r=0.83, P< 0.0001) and with Cl-in ( r =- 0.57 and -0.53, P< 0.001, respectively). ROC analysis demonstrated no superiority of Cys C over Scr. Gats equation achieved the highest accuracy of 70% in patients with GFR >= 60 ml/ min/ 1.73m(2). In patients with GFR >= 60 ml/ min/ 1.73 m(2), the Nankivell equation demonstrated the highest accuracy of 73.91%. Cys C- based equations were not depicted to be thoroughly accurate. Bias, precision and agreement were otherwise similar in all GFR tests. Conclusion. S-cr- based equations did not appear to be inferior to Cys C- based equations as a means to estimate GFR in renal transplant patients.
引用
收藏
页码:2659 / 2668
页数:10
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]   Serum cystatin C as an index of renal function in kidney transplant patients [J].
Akbas, SH ;
Yavuz, A ;
Tuncer, M ;
Ruhi, C ;
Gurkan, A ;
Cetinkaya, R ;
Demirbas, A ;
Gultekin, M ;
Akaydin, M ;
Ersoy, F .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2004, 36 (01) :99-101
[2]   Chronic kidney disease and automatic reporting of estimated glomerular filtration rate: a position statement [J].
Anavekar, N ;
Bais, R ;
Carney, S ;
Eris, J ;
Gallagher, M ;
Johnson, D ;
Jones, G ;
Sikaris, K ;
Lonergan, M ;
Ludlow, M ;
Mackie, J ;
Mathew, T ;
May, S ;
McBride, G ;
Meerkin, M ;
Peake, M ;
Power, D ;
Snelling, P ;
Voss, D ;
Walker, R .
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2005, 183 (03) :138-+
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2000, J AM SOC NEPHROL
[4]  
Biesen WV, 2006, NEPHROL DIAL TRANSPL, V21, P77
[5]   USE OF SERUM CREATININE CONCENTRATIONS TO DETERMINE RENAL-FUNCTION [J].
BJORNSSON, TD .
CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS, 1979, 4 (03) :200-222
[6]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[7]  
Bökenkamp A, 1999, CLIN CHEM, V45, P1866
[8]   Predictive performance of renal function equations for patients with chronic kidney disease and normal serum creatinine levels [J].
Bostom, AG ;
Kronenberg, F ;
Ritz, E .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2002, 13 (08) :2140-2144
[9]  
Christensson A, 2003, NEPHRON PHYSIOL, V94, P19, DOI [10.1159/000071287, DOI 10.1159/000071287]
[10]   Serum cystatin C, a potent inhibitor of cysteine proteinases, is elevated in asthmatic patients [J].
Cimerman, N ;
Brguljan, PM ;
Krasovec, M ;
Suskovic, S ;
Kos, J .
CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2000, 300 (1-2) :83-95