Epidemiology and Impact of Scarring After Burn Injury: A Systematic Review of the Literature

被引:253
作者
Lawrence, John W. [2 ]
Mason, Shawn T. [3 ,4 ]
Schomer, Katherine [5 ]
Klein, Matthew B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Harborview Med Ctr, Div Plast Surg, Burn Ctr, Seattle, WA 98104 USA
[2] CUNY, Dept Psychol, Coll Staten Isl, New York, NY 10021 USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat & Burn Surg, Baltimore, MD USA
[4] Brooke Army Med Ctr, Warrior Resiliency Program, San Antonio, TX USA
[5] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Dept Rehabil Med, Model Syst Knowledge Translat Ctr, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
BODY-IMAGE; PERCEIVED STIGMATIZATION; POSTTRAUMATIC-STRESS; PEDIATRIC BURNS; HEALTH SCALE; SELF-ESTEEM; SURVIVORS; SCARS; ADOLESCENTS; ADULTS;
D O I
10.1097/BCR.0b013e3182374452
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
100218 [急诊医学];
摘要
The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review of the existing literature on the incidence of hypertrophic scarring and the psychosocial impact of burn scars. In a comprehensive literature review, the authors identified 48 articles published since 1965 and written in English which reported the incidence and risk factors for hypertrophic scarring or assessed outcomes related to scarring. Most studies had important methodological limitations limiting the generalizability of the findings. In particular, the absence of standardized valid measures of scarring and other outcome variables was a major barrier to drawing strong conclusions. Among studies on hypertrophic scarring, the prevalence rate varied between 32 and 72%. Identified risk factors included dark skin, female gender, young age, burn site on neck and upper limb, multiple surgical procedures, meshed skin graph, time to healing, and burn severity. With regard to psychosocial outcomes, two studies compared pediatric burn survivors with a nonburn comparison group on a body image measure; neither study found differences between groups. Across studies, burn severity and location had a modest relationship with psychosocial outcome variables. Psychosocial variables such as social comfort and perceived stigmatization were more highly associated with body image than burn characteristics. To advance our knowledge of the epidemiology of scars and the burden of scars, future studies need to implement more rigorous methodologies. In particular, standardized valid measures of scarring and other outcomes should be developed. This process could be facilitated by an international collaboration among burn centers. (J Burn Care Res 2012;33:136-146)
引用
收藏
页码:136 / 146
页数:11
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]
Abdullah A., 1994, Journal of Burn Care and Rehabilitation, V15, P164, DOI 10.1097/00004630-199403000-00011
[2]
INCIDENCE OF LONG-TERM PSYCHIATRIC COMPLICATIONS IN SEVERELY BURNED ADULTS [J].
ANDREASEN, NJ ;
NORRIS, AS ;
HARTFORD, CE .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1971, 174 (05) :785-+
[3]
Beard S A, 1989, J Burn Care Rehabil, V10, P550, DOI 10.1097/00004630-198911000-00019
[4]
Body image of patients with burns sequellae:: evaluation through the critical incident technique [J].
Bergamasco, EC ;
Rossi, LA ;
Amâncio, ADCG ;
de Carvalho, EC .
BURNS, 2002, 28 (01) :47-52
[5]
BERNSTEIN NR, 1982, CLIN PLAST SURG, V9, P337
[6]
Evaluating the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions for individuals with visible differences: A systematic review of the empirical literature [J].
Bessell, Alyson ;
Moss, Timothy P. .
BODY IMAGE, 2007, 4 (03) :227-238
[7]
A BURN SPECIFIC HEALTH SCALE [J].
BLADES, B ;
MELLIS, N ;
MUNSTER, AM .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1982, 22 (10) :872-875
[8]
Efficacy of a short-term, intensive social skills training program for burned adolescents [J].
Blakeney, P ;
Thomas, C ;
Holzer, C ;
Rose, M ;
Berniger, F ;
Meyer, WJ .
JOURNAL OF BURN CARE & REHABILITATION, 2005, 26 (06) :546-555
[9]
Blakeney P, 1995, J Burn Care Rehabil, V16, P469, DOI 10.1097/00004630-199507000-00018
[10]
Blakeney P., 1995, J BURN CARE REHABIL, V16, P466