Randomization and allocation concealment: a practical guide for researchers

被引:481
作者
Doig, GS [1 ]
Simpson, F [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Royal N Shore Hosp, ICU, No Clin Sch, St Leonards, NSW 2065, Australia
关键词
sealed envelopes; randomization; block; randomized controlled trial; allocation concealment tutorial;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcrc.2005.04.005
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Although the randomized controlled trial is the most important tool currently available to objectively assess the impact of new treatments, the act of randomization itself is often poorly conducted and incompletely reported. The primary purpose of randomizing patients into treatment arms is to prevent researchers, clinicians, and patients from predicting, and thus influencing, which patients will receive which treatments. This important source of bias can be eliminated by concealing the upcoming allocation sequence from researchers and participants. Although there are many approaches to randomization that are known to effectively conceal the randomization sequence, the use of sequentially numbered, opaque sealed envelopes (SNOSE) is both cheap and effective. The purpose of this tutorial is to describe a step-by-step process for the preparation of SNOSE. We will outline how to prepare SNOSE to preserve allocation concealment in a trial that (a) uses unrestricted (simple) randomization, (b) stratifies randomization on one factor, (e) uses permuted blocks and, and (d) is conducted at more than I study site. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:187 / 191
页数:5
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
Altman DG, 1999, BRIT MED J, V318, P1209
[2]   The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: Explanation and elaboration [J].
Altman, DG ;
Schulz, KF ;
Moher, D ;
Egger, M ;
Davidoff, F ;
Elbourne, D ;
Gotzsche, PC ;
Lang, T .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2001, 134 (08) :663-694
[3]   Statistics notes - Concealing treatment allocation in randomised trials [J].
Altman, DG ;
Schulz, KF .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 323 (7310) :446-447
[4]  
[Anonymous], NIH INV CLIN TRIALS
[5]   Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials - The CONSORT statement [J].
Begg, C ;
Cho, M ;
Eastwood, S ;
Horton, R ;
Moher, D ;
Olkin, I ;
Pitkin, R ;
Rennie, D ;
Schulz, KF ;
Simel, D ;
Stroup, DF .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1996, 276 (08) :637-639
[6]   A review of the true methodological quality of nutritional support trials conducted in the critically ill: Time for improvement [J].
Doig, GS ;
Simpson, F ;
Delaney, A .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2005, 100 (02) :527-533
[7]   Allocation concealment and blinding: when ignorance is bliss [J].
Forder, PM ;
Gebski, VJ ;
Keech, AC .
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2005, 182 (02) :87-89
[8]   Systematic reviews in health care -: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials [J].
Jüni, P ;
Altman, DG ;
Egger, M .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 323 (7303) :42-46
[9]   Introducing Critical Appraisal to studies of animal models investigating novel therapies in sepsis [J].
Piper, RD ;
Cook, DJ ;
Bone, RC ;
Sibbald, WJ .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1996, 24 (12) :2059-2070
[10]  
SCHULZ KF, 1995, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V274, P1456