Carotid endarterectomy - An evidence-based review - Report of the therapeutics and technology assessment subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology

被引:370
作者
Chaturvedi, S
Bruno, A
Feasby, T
Holloway, R
Benavente, O
Cohen, SN
Cote, R
Hess, D
Saver, J
Spence, JD
Stern, B
Wilterdink, J
机构
[1] Wayne State Univ, Stroke Program, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
[2] Wayne State Univ, Dept Neurol, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
[3] Indiana Univ, Dept Neurol, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
[4] Univ Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2M7, Canada
[5] Univ Rochester, Dept Neurol, Rochester, NY USA
[6] Sunrise Hosp, Stroke Prevent Program, Las Vegas, NV USA
[7] Univ Texas, Dept Neurol, San Antonio, TX 78285 USA
[8] McGill Univ, Dept Neurol, Montreal, PQ H3A 2T5, Canada
[9] Med Coll Georgia, Dept Neurol, Augusta, GA 30912 USA
[10] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Stroke Ctr, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[11] Univ Maryland, Robarts Res Inst, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[12] Univ Maryland, Dept Neurol, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[13] Brown Univ, Dept Neurol, Providence, RI 02912 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1212/01.wnl.0000176036.07558.82
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To assess the efficacy of carotid endarterectomy for stroke prevention in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients with internal carotid artery stenosis. Additional clinical scenarios, such as use of endarterectomy combined with cardiac surgery, are also reviewed. Methods: The authors selected nine important clinical questions. A systematic search was performed for articles from 1990 (the year of the last statement) until 2001. Additional articles from 2002 through 2004 were included using prespecified criteria. Two reviewers also screened for other relevant articles from 2002 to 2004. Case reports, review articles, technical studies, and single surgeon case series were excluded. Results: For several questions, high quality randomized clinical trials had been completed. Carotid endarterectomy reduces the stroke risk compared to medical therapy alone for patients with 70 to 99% symptomatic stenosis (16% absolute risk reduction at 5 years). There is a smaller benefit for patients with 50 to 69% symptomatic stenosis (absolute risk reduction 4.6% at 5 years). There is a small benefit for asymptomatic patients with 60 to 99% stenosis if the perioperative complication rate is low. Aspirin in a dose of 81 to 325 mg per day is preferred vs higher doses (650 to 1,300 mg per day) in patients undergoing endarterectomy. Conclusions: Evidence supports carotid endarterectomy for severe (70 to 99%) symptomatic stenosis (Level A). Endarterectomy is moderately useful for symptomatic patients with 50 to 69% stenosis (Level B) and not indicated for symptomatic patients with < 50% stenosis (Level A). For asymptomatic patients with 60 to 99% stenosis, the benefit/risk ratio is smaller compared to symptomatic patients and individual decisions must be made. Endarterectomy can reduce the future stroke rate if the perioperative stroke/death rate is kept low (< 3%) (Level A). Low dose aspirin (81 to 325 mg) is preferred for patients before and after carotid endarterectomy to reduce the rate of stroke, myocardial infarction, and death (Level A).
引用
收藏
页码:794 / 801
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] *AM AC NEUR THER T, 1990, NEUROLOGY, V40, P682
  • [2] Effect of contralateral occlusion on long-term efficacy of endarterectomy in the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study (ACAS)
    Baker, WH
    Howard, VJ
    Howard, G
    Toole, JF
    [J]. STROKE, 2000, 31 (10) : 2330 - 2334
  • [3] CAROTID ENDARTERECTOMY AND THE MEASUREMENT OF STENOSIS
    BARNETT, HJM
    WARLOW, CP
    [J]. STROKE, 1993, 24 (09) : 1281 - 1284
  • [4] Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis
    Barnett, HJM
    Taylor, W
    Eliasziw, M
    Fox, AJ
    Ferguson, GG
    Haynes, RB
    Rankin, RN
    Clagett, GP
    Hachinski, VC
    Sackett, DL
    Thorpe, KE
    Meldrum, HE
    Spence, JD
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1998, 339 (20) : 1415 - 1425
  • [5] Prognosis after transient monocular blindness associated with carotid-artery stenosis
    Benavente, O
    Eliasziw, M
    Streifler, JY
    Fox, AJ
    Barnett, HJM
    Meldrum, H
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2001, 345 (15) : 1084 - 1090
  • [6] Guidelines for carotid endarterectomy - A statement for healthcare professionals from a Special Writing Group of the Stroke Council, American Heart Association
    Biller, J
    Feinberg, WM
    Castaldo, JE
    Whittemore, AD
    Harbaugh, RE
    Dempsey, RJ
    Caplan, LR
    Kresowik, TF
    Matchar, DB
    Toole, JF
    Easton, JD
    Adams, HP
    Brass, LM
    Hobson, RW
    Brott, TG
    Sternau, L
    [J]. STROKE, 1998, 29 (02) : 554 - 562
  • [7] Brown MM, 2001, LANCET, V357, P1729
  • [8] Should the multicenter carotid endarterectomy trials be repeated?
    Chaturvedi, S
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY, 2003, 60 (05) : 774 - 775
  • [9] Executive summary of the Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (Adult Treatment Panel III)
    Cleeman, JI
    Grundy, SM
    Becker, D
    Clark, LT
    Cooper, RS
    Denke, MA
    Howard, WJ
    Hunninghake, DB
    Illingworth, DR
    Luepker, RV
    McBride, P
    McKenney, JM
    Pasternak, RC
    Stone, NJ
    Van Horn, L
    Brewer, HB
    Ernst, ND
    Gordon, D
    Levy, D
    Rifkind, B
    Rossouw, JE
    Savage, P
    Haffner, SM
    Orloff, DG
    Proschan, MA
    Schwartz, JS
    Sempos, CT
    Shero, ST
    Murray, EZ
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 285 (19): : 2486 - 2497
  • [10] DIENER HC, 1991, STROKE, V22, P1229