Unnecessary cesarean delivery in Louisiana: An analysis of birth certificate data

被引:22
作者
Kabir, AA
Steinmann, WC
Myers, L
Khan, MM
Herrera, EA
Yu, SK
Jooma, N
机构
[1] Tulane Ctr Clin Effectiveness & Prevent, New Orleans, LA 70112 USA
[2] Dept Biostat, New Orleans, LA USA
[3] Hlth Syst Management & Int Hlth & Dev, New Orleans, LA USA
[4] Tulane Univ, Sch Publ Hlth & Trop Med, New Orleans, LA 70118 USA
[5] Dept Obstet & Gynecol, New Orleans, LA USA
[6] Tulane Univ, Ctr Hlth Sci, New Orleans, LA 70118 USA
[7] Off Publ Hlth, New Orleans, LA USA
关键词
primary cesarean delivery; repeat cesarean delivery; unnecessary cesarean delivery; birth certificate data;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2003.07.009
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: The purpose of this study was to explore the temporal trends and factors that are associated with cesarean deliveries and potentially unnecessary cesarean deliveries. Study design: The Louisiana birth certificate database was evaluated to identify a total of 57 potential indications/risk factors and maternal demographic factors that are associated with methods of delivery over the period from January 1993 to December 2000. A cesarean delivery without any potential indications/risk factors in the birth certificate was classified as unnecessary. Results: The primary cesarean delivery rate decreased and the repeat cesarean delivery rate increased significantly during the study period. But neither the absence nor the presence of potential indications/risk factors accounted for these changes. The average potentially unnecessary primary and repeat cesarean deliveries in Louisiana were 17 and 43, respectively, per 100 cesarean deliveries over the years 1993 through 2000. Conclusion: The proportions of potentially unnecessary cesarean deliveries are relatively high in Louisiana. It is important to explore the influence of nonclinical factors on unnecessary cesarean delivery to reduce the cesarean rates. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:10 / 19
页数:10
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
ABITBOL MM, 1993, AM FAM PHYSICIAN, V47, P129
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, HLTH PEOPL 2010, V2nd
[3]  
Ash A, 1994, Risk Adjustment for Measuring Health Care Outcomes, P313
[4]   HOW SAFE IS CESAREAN-SECTION IN CURRENT PRACTICE - A SURVEY OF MORTALITY AND SERIOUS MORBIDITY [J].
BROE, S ;
KHOO, SK .
AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 1989, 29 (02) :93-98
[5]   THE QUALITY OF THE NEW BIRTH CERTIFICATE DATA - A VALIDATION-STUDY IN NORTH-CAROLINA [J].
BUESCHER, PA ;
TAYLOR, KP ;
DAVIS, MH ;
BOWLING, JM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1993, 83 (08) :1163-1165
[6]   THE EFFECT OF PHYSICIAN FACTORS ON THE CESAREAN-SECTION DECISION [J].
BURNS, LR ;
GELLER, SE ;
WHOLEY, DR .
MEDICAL CARE, 1995, 33 (04) :365-382
[7]  
Butcher A H, 1997, J Public Health Manag Pract, V3, P41
[8]   An ethically justified algorithm for offering, recommending, and performing cesarean delivery and its application in managed care practice [J].
Chervenak, FA ;
McCullough, LB .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 87 (02) :302-305
[9]   CHANGES IN CESAREAN DELIVERY IN THE UNITED-STATES, 1988 AND 1993 [J].
CLARKE, SC ;
TAFFEL, S .
BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE, 1995, 22 (02) :63-67
[10]   Factors associated with unjustified Cesarean section in four hospitals in Cali, Colombia [J].
Gómez, OL ;
Carrasquilla, G .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 1999, 11 (05) :385-389