Biomechanical differences among pes cavus, neutrally aligned, and pes planus feet in subjects with diabetes

被引:68
作者
Ledoux, WR
Shofer, JB
Ahroni, JH
Smith, DG
Sangeorzan, BJ
Boyko, EJ
机构
[1] VA Puget Sound Hlth Care Syst, Dept Vet Affairs, Epidemiol Res & Informat Ctr, Seattle, WA 98108 USA
[2] VA Puget Sound Hlth Care Syst, RR&D Ctr Excellence Limb Loss Prevent & Prosthet, Epidemiol Res & Informat Ctr, Seattle, WA USA
[3] VA Puget Sound Hlth Care Syst, Res & Dev Serv, Epidemiol Res & Informat Ctr, Seattle, WA USA
[4] VA Puget Sound Hlth Care Syst, Gen Internal Med Sect, Epidemiol Res & Informat Ctr, Seattle, WA USA
[5] Univ Washington, Dept Orthopaed & Sports Med, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[6] Univ Washington, Dept Mech Engn, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[7] Univ Washington, Dept Biobehav Nursing & Hlth Syst, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
diabetes mellitus; flatfoot; foot deformities;
D O I
10.1177/107110070302401107
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of this study was to quantify differences in joint range of motion, foot deformity, and foot morphology among pes cavus, neutrally aligned, pes planus rigid, and pes planus flexible feet. A cohort of 1047 veterans with diabetes (contributing 2047 feet) was enrolled in a prospective study of diabetic ulcer risk factors (the Seattle Diabetic Foot Study). Significant differences between foot types were found. Pes cavus feet had an increased percentage of prominent metatarsal heads, bony prominences, and hammer/claw toes (p < .0001), as well as significantly increased amounts of hallux dorsiflexion and decreased amounts of hallux plantarflexion (p < .0001) with a total range of motion equal to the other foot types (p = .3). Neutrally aligned feet had a lower percentage of intrinsic muscle atrophy, bony prominences, and hammer/claw toes (p < .0001). Pes planus feet had an increased lateral talometatarsal angle (p < .0001) and an increased second metatarsal length. These data demonstrate structural differences between foot types in a population with diabetes.
引用
收藏
页码:845 / 850
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]
Bevans J., 1992, FOOT, V2, P166, DOI DOI 10.1016/0958-2592(92)90067-Y
[2]
Bordelon R L, 1980, Foot Ankle, V1, P143
[3]
A prospective study of risk factors for diabetic foot ulcer - The Seattle diabetic foot study [J].
Boyko, EJ ;
Ahroni, JH ;
Stensel, V ;
Forsberg, RC ;
Davignon, DR ;
Smith, DG .
DIABETES CARE, 1999, 22 (07) :1036-1042
[4]
THE ARCH INDEX - A USEFUL MEASURE FROM FOOTPRINTS [J].
CAVANAGH, PR ;
RODGERS, MM .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1987, 20 (05) :547-551
[5]
CONSISTENCY OF VISUAL ASSESSMENTS OF ARCH HEIGHT AMONG CLINICIAN [J].
COWAN, DN ;
ROBINSON, JR ;
JONES, BH ;
POLLY, DW ;
BERREY, BH .
FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 1994, 15 (04) :213-217
[6]
Pes planus in patients with posterior tibial tendon insufficiency: Asymptomatic versus symptomatic foot [J].
Dyal, CM ;
Feder, J ;
Deland, JT ;
Thompson, FM .
FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 1997, 18 (02) :85-88
[7]
Gould N, 1982, Foot Ankle, V2, P213
[8]
GREEN DR, 1987, COMPREHENSIVE TXB FO, P287
[9]
THE SIGNIFICANCE OF PES PLANUS IN JUVENILE HALLUX-VALGUS [J].
KILMARTIN, TE ;
WALLACE, WA .
FOOT & ANKLE, 1992, 13 (02) :53-56
[10]
Komeda T, 2001, J Orthop Sci, V6, P110, DOI 10.1007/s007760100056