The performance of two data-generation processes for data with specified marginal treatment odds ratios

被引:25
作者
Austin, Peter C. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Stafford, James [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Inst Clin Evaluat Sci, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Dept Stat, Toronto, ON, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院; 加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
average treatment effect; datag-enerating process; marginal odds ratios; marginal treatment effect; Monte Carlo simulations; simulations;
D O I
10.1080/03610910801942430
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
Monte Carlo simulation methods are increasingly being used to evaluate the property of statistical estimators in a variety of settings. The utility of these methods depends upon the existence of an appropriate data-generating process. Observational studies are increasingly being used to estimate the effects of exposures and interventions on outcomes. Conventional regression models allow for the estimation of conditional or adjusted estimates of treatment effects. There is an increasing interest in statistical methods for estimating marginal or average treatment effects. However, in many settings, conditional treatment effects can differ from marginal treatment effects. Therefore, existing data-generating processes for conditional treatment effects are of little use in assessing the performance of methods for estimating marginal treatment effects. In the current study, we describe and evaluate the performance of two different data-generation processes for generating data with a specified marginal odds ratio. The first process is based upon computing Taylor Series expansions of the probabilities of success for treated and untreated subjects. The expansions are then integrated over the distribution of the random variables to determine the marginal probabilities of success for treated and untreated subjects. The second process is based upon an iterative process of evaluating marginal odds ratios using Monte Carlo integration. The second method was found to be computationally simpler and to have superior performance compared to the first method.
引用
收藏
页码:1039 / 1051
页数:13
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   A comparison of propensity score methods: A case-study estimating the effectiveness of post-AMI statin use [J].
Austin, PC ;
Mamdani, MM .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2006, 25 (12) :2084-2106
[2]   The use of the propensity score for estimating treatment effects: administrative versus clinical data [J].
Austin, PC ;
Mamdani, MM ;
Stukel, TA ;
Anderson, GM ;
Tu, JV .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2005, 24 (10) :1563-1578
[3]  
AUSTIN PC, 2007, J CLIN EPID IN PRESS, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.JCLINEPI.2007.07.011
[4]   The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating marginal odds ratios [J].
Austin, Peter C. .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2007, 26 (16) :3078-3094
[5]   A comparison of the ability of different propensity score models to balance measured variables between treated and untreated subjects: a Monte Carlo study [J].
Austin, Peter C. ;
Grootendorst, Paul ;
Anderson, Geoffrey M. .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2007, 26 (04) :734-753
[6]   Conditioning on the propensity score can result in biased estimation of common measures of treatment effect: A Monte Carlo study (p n/a) [J].
Austin, Peter C. ;
Grootendorst, Paul ;
Normand, Sharon-Lise T. ;
Anderson, Geoffrey M. .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2007, 26 (16) :3208-3210
[7]   Generating survival times to simulate Cox proportional hazards models [J].
Bender, R ;
Augustin, T ;
Blettner, M .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2005, 24 (11) :1713-1723
[8]  
*C COR DEV TEAM, 2005, R LANG ENV STAT COMP
[9]  
GAIL MH, 1984, BIOMETRIKA, V71, P431
[10]  
Greenland S, 1999, STAT SCI, V14, P29