Attribution of flood risk in urban areas

被引:91
作者
Dawson, R. J. [1 ]
Speight, L. [1 ]
Hall, J. W. [1 ]
Djordjevic, S. [2 ]
Savic, D. [2 ]
Leandro, J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Newcastle, Sch Civil Engn & Geosci, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, Tyne & Wear, England
[2] Univ Exeter, Ctr Water Syst, Exeter EX4 4QF, Devon, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会; 英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
flood risk analysis; hydraulic modelling; infrastructure management; integrated urban flood risk management; sensitivity analysis; sewer blockage;
D O I
10.2166/hydro.2008.054
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Flooding in urban areas represents a particular challenge to modellers and flood risk managers because of the complex interactions of surface and sewer flows. Quantified flood risk estimates provide a common metric that can be used to compare risks from different sources. In situations where there are several organisations responsible for flood risk management we wish to be able to disaggregate the total risk and attribute it to different components in the system and/or agents with responsibility for risk reduction in order to target management actions. Two approaches to risk attribution are discussed: Standards-based attribution, which is a deterministic approach, based upon the performance of different engineering components in the system at their "design standard". Sensitivity-based attribution, which apportions risk between the variables that influence the total flood risk. Whilst both these approaches are feasible for the small system considered here, in practice urban flooding systems involve tens of thousands of variables. The only feasible approach to tackling this problem for large urban systems is therefore by hierarchical simplification of the system, with the attribution analysis being applied in several tiers of detail. In this paper, the applicability of a hierarchical approach is demonstrated in the context of sewer pipe blockages. The results demonstrate the potential of attribution methods to support the development of integrated urban flood risk management strategies, as they can identify the forcing variables and infrastructure components that have the most influence upon flood risk.
引用
收藏
页码:275 / 288
页数:14
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
*ABI, 2004, CAS INCR INV SEW INF
[2]  
ANDJELKOVIC I, 2001, IHP 5 TECHNICAL DOCU, V50
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2008, LEARNING LESSONS 200
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Sensitivity Analysis
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2006, DESIGNING EXCEEDANCE
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2004, URBAN DRAINAGE
[7]  
BURTON A, 2004, BUILT ENV WEATHER SC
[8]  
CIRIA, 1997, 45 CIRIA
[9]   RANK TRANSFORMATIONS AS A BRIDGE BETWEEN PARAMETRIC AND NONPARAMETRIC STATISTICS [J].
CONOVER, WJ ;
IMAN, RL .
AMERICAN STATISTICIAN, 1981, 35 (03) :124-129
[10]   Sampling-based flood risk analysis for fluvial dike systems [J].
Dawson, R ;
Hall, J ;
Sayers, P ;
Bates, P ;
Rosu, C .
STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2005, 19 (06) :388-402