Inversion strategy in crosshole radar tomography using information of data subsets

被引:27
作者
Becht, A [1 ]
Tronicke, J [1 ]
Appel, E [1 ]
Dietrich, P [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tubingen, Inst Geosci, D-72076 Tubingen, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1190/1.1649390
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Detecting discrete anomalies, such as cavities or tunnels, is an important application of crosshole radar tomography. However, crosshole tomographic inversion results are frequently ambiguous, showing smearing effects and inversion artifacts. These ambiguities lead to uncertainties in interpretation; hence, the size and position of anomalies can only be interpreted with limited accuracy and reliability. We present an inversion strategy for investigating discrete anomalies with crosshole radar tomography. In addition to the full traveltime data set, we use subsets of specified ray-angle intervals for tomographic inversion. By analyzing inversion results from different ray-angle intervals, a more accurate interpretation of anomalies is possible. The second step of our strategy is to develop a good inhomogeneous starting model from joint interpretation of the inversion results from different subsets. The third step is to invert the full data set using this new starting model and to evaluate the inversion results by analyzing the distributions of mean square traveltime residuals with respect to the ray angles. We use a synthetic model with two discrete anomalies located roughly at the same depth to demonstrate and evaluate our approach. This inversion strategy is also applied to a field data set collected to investigate karst cavities in limestone. From the inversion results of both examples, we show that horizontal smearing of anomalies can be reduced by eliminating near-horizontal rays. A good starting model can be obtained based on the joint interpretation of the inversion results of the different subsets; it leads to a high-resolution final image of the full data set.
引用
收藏
页码:222 / 230
页数:9
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Finite-difference modeling of electromagnetic wave propagation in dispersive and attenuating media [J].
Bergmann, T ;
Robertsson, JOA ;
Holliger, K .
GEOPHYSICS, 1998, 63 (03) :856-867
[2]  
BREGMAN ND, 1989, CAN J EXPL GEOPHYS, V25, P7
[3]   Electromagnetic velocity inversion using 2-D Maxwell's equations [J].
Cai, WY ;
Qin, FH ;
Schuster, GT .
GEOPHYSICS, 1996, 61 (04) :1007-1021
[4]  
CLEMENT WP, 2000, S APPL GEOPH ENG ENV, P553
[5]   COMPUTERIZED GEOPHYSICAL TOMOGRAPHY [J].
DINES, KA ;
LYTLE, RJ .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE, 1979, 67 (07) :1065-1073
[6]   SOME SOURCES OF DISTORTION IN TOMOGRAPHIC VELOCITY IMAGES [J].
DYER, B ;
WORTHINGTON, MH .
GEOPHYSICAL PROSPECTING, 1988, 36 (03) :209-222
[7]   Radio tomography and borehole radar delineation of the McConnell nickel sulfide deposit, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada [J].
Fullagar, PK ;
Livelybrooks, DW ;
Zhang, P ;
Calvert, AJ ;
Wu, YR .
GEOPHYSICS, 2000, 65 (06) :1920-1930
[8]  
GHESHLAGHI F, 1998, J ENVIRON ENG GEOPH, V3, P41
[9]  
Jackson M., 1995, S APPL GEOPH ENG ENV, P853
[10]  
JACKSON MJ, 1996, 9617 US DEP INT BUR