Screening with a uterine Doppler in low risk pregnant women followed by low dose aspirin in women with abnormal results:: a multicenter randomised controlled trial

被引:41
作者
Goffinet, F
Aboulker, D
Paris-Llado, J
Bucourt, M
Uzan, M
Papiernik, E
Bréart, G
机构
[1] INSERM, U149, Epidemiol Res Unit Women & Childrens Hlth, F-75014 Paris, France
[2] Cent Hosp Gen, Aulnay Sous Bois, France
[3] Hop Prive, St Denis, France
[4] Clin Ferme, Bobigny, France
[5] Ctr Hosp Univ Jean Verdier, Bondy, France
[6] Clin Vauban, Livry Gargan, France
[7] Ctr Hosp, Mountfermeil, France
[8] Ctr Hosp, Montreuil, France
[9] Ctr Hosp, St Denis, France
[10] Clin Hoffman, Rosny Sous Bois, France
[11] Clin Vert Galant, Tremblay, France
[12] Ctr Hosp Reg Univ Caen, Caen, France
[13] Ctr Hosp, Perigueux, France
[14] Ctr Hosp Cote Basque, Bayonne, France
[15] Ctr Hosp Intercommunal, Poissy, France
[16] Maternity Port Royal, Paris, France
[17] Hop Europeen Paris Roseraie, Aubervilliers, France
来源
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY | 2001年 / 108卷 / 05期
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1471-0528.2001.00116.x
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives To assess whether systematic screening with an uterine artery Doppler in low risk pregnant women followed by the prescription of low dose aspirin in cases with abnormal results reduced the incidence of intrauterine growth restriction and pre-eclampsia. Design A multicentre randomised trial. Population 3317 low risk pregnant women. In the Doppler group, the uterine artery Doppler was performed between 20 and 24 weeks. Women with abnormal results received 100 mg of aspirin daily until the 35th week. Main outcome measures Intrauterine growth restriction was defined as birthweight below the tenth and the third centile according to gestational age. Pre-eclampsia was defined as hypertension associated with proteinuria > 0.5g/L. Results Intrauterine growth restriction, whether defined by the third or tenth centile, did not differ significantly between the two groups (RR = 1.22 [0.73 - 2.04] and 1.18 [0.93 - 1.51] respectively). Screening with uterine artery Doppler did not affect birthweight or any of the criteria of perinatal morbidity. There was no effect on the incidence of pre-eclampsia (RR = 1.99 [0.97 - 4.09]) or hypertensive disorders. These results were the same for nulliparae and multiparae. Conclusions There is no justification for screening with uterine artery Doppler in a low risk population, even if abnormal results are followed by aspirin treatment and increased prenatal surveillance. Future studies must assess predictive tests that can be performed early in pregnancy and can identify populations at very high risk of pre-eclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction. Only when all of these conditions are fulfilled, aspirin or other treatments may prove its efficacy.
引用
收藏
页码:510 / 518
页数:9
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1995, BR J OBSTET GYNAECOL, V102, P853
  • [2] Atallah AN, 1996, BRIT J OBSTET GYNAEC, V103, P39
  • [3] ATALLAH AN, 2000, IN PRESS COCHRANE DA, V3
  • [4] BEROYZ G, 1994, LANCET, V343, P619
  • [5] BLONDEL B, 1999, ENCY MED CHIR
  • [6] BLONDEL B, 1994, ENCY MED CHIR
  • [7] DOPPLER ULTRASOUND SCREENING AS PART OF ROUTINE ANTENATAL SCANNING - PREDICTION OF PREECLAMPSIA AND INTRAUTERINE GROWTH-RETARDATION
    BOWER, S
    SCHUCHTER, K
    CAMPBELL, S
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1993, 100 (11): : 989 - 994
  • [8] Prediction of pre-eclampsia by abnormal uterine Doppler ultrasound and modification by aspirin
    Bower, SJ
    Harrington, KF
    Schuchter, K
    McGirr, C
    Campbell, S
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1996, 103 (07): : 625 - 629
  • [9] RISK OF FETAL GROWTH-RETARDATION AS A RESULT OF MATERNAL HYPERTENSION - PREPARATION TO A TRIAL ON ANTIHYPERTENSIVE DRUGS
    BREART, G
    RABARISON, Y
    PLOUIN, PF
    SUREAU, C
    RUMEAUROUQUETTE, C
    [J]. DEVELOPMENTAL PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS, 1982, 4 : 116 - 123
  • [10] EARLY DETECTION OF PREECLAMPSIA
    DEKKER, GA
    SIBAI, BM
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1991, 165 (01) : 160 - 172