Capsule endoscopy - comparison of two strategies of bowel preparation

被引:57
作者
Niv, Y
Niv, G
Wiser, K
Demarco, DC
机构
[1] Rabin Med Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol, IL-49100 Petah Tiqwa, Israel
[2] Tel Aviv Univ, Sackler Fac Med, IL-69978 Tel Aviv, Israel
[3] Baylor Univ, Med Ctr, Div Gastroenterol, Dallas, TX USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2036.2005.02647.x
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Capsule endoscopy can identify lesions of the small bowel that cannot be detected by other techniques. In addition to patient safety, quality of care and cost-efficiency, good preparation is an important factor for good visualization. Aim: To evaluate the efficacy of oral sodium phosphate preparation. Methods: Forty-six consecutive patients scheduled for capsule endoscopy in two medical centres. The patients treated in Dallas were prepared by 12 h fasting (group A), and those treated in Israel were also asked to drink 45 mL of sodium phosphate with water (group B). An experienced endoscopist, blinded to the method used, graded the quality of preparation according to visual capability, and to relative durations of each grade. Results: The quality of the preparation was poor in 35% of group A compared with 4% of group B (P = 0.023). The mean duration of good preparation with excellent visualization was 122 +/- 110 min in group A and 180 +/- 96 min in group B (P = 0.006). Preparation with sodium phosphate and lower patient weight were significant predictive factors for good visualization. Conclusions: Bowel preparation offers better visualization than overnight fasting alone and is associated with fewer disturbances by intraluminal turbid fluid.
引用
收藏
页码:957 / 962
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   A patient education program is cost-effective for preventing failure of endoscopic procedures in a gastroenterology department [J].
Abuksis, G ;
Mor, M ;
Segal, N ;
Shemesh, I ;
Morad, I ;
Plaut, S ;
Weiss, E ;
Sulkes, J ;
Fraser, G ;
Niv, Y .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2001, 96 (06) :1786-1790
[2]   Low volume bowel preparation for colonoscopy:: Randomized, endoscopist-blinded trial of liquid sodium phosphate versus tablet sodium phosphate [J].
Balaban, DH ;
Leavell, BS ;
Oblinger, MJ ;
Thompson, WO ;
Bolton, ND ;
Pambianco, DJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2003, 98 (04) :827-832
[3]   The effect of polyethylene glycol 400 on gastrointestinal transit: Implications for the formulation of poorly-water soluble drugs [J].
Basit, AW ;
Newton, JM ;
Short, MD ;
Waddington, WA ;
Ell, PJ ;
Lacey, LF .
PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 2001, 18 (08) :1146-1150
[4]   Evaluation of small-bowel transit for solid and liquid test meal in healthy men and women [J].
Bennink, R ;
Peeters, M ;
Van den Maegdenbergh, V ;
Geypens, B ;
Rutgeerts, P ;
De Roo, M ;
Mortelmans, L .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 1999, 26 (12) :1560-1566
[5]   A prospective trial comparing small bowel radiographs and video capsule endoscopy for suspected small bowel disease [J].
Costamagna, G ;
Shah, SK ;
Riccioni, ME ;
Foschia, F ;
Mutignani, M ;
Perri, V ;
Vecchioli, A ;
Brizi, MG ;
Picciocchi, A ;
Marano, P .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2002, 123 (04) :999-1005
[6]   Oral sodium phosphate solution - A review of its use as a colorectal cleanser [J].
Curran, MP ;
Plosker, GL .
DRUGS, 2004, 64 (15) :1697-1714
[7]   Cutting the cord for capsule endoscopy [J].
Faigel, DO ;
Fennerty, MB .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2002, 123 (04) :1385-1388
[8]  
Fireman Z, 2004, ISRAEL MED ASSOC J, V6, P521
[9]   Gastrointestinal mean transit times in young and middle-aged healthy subjects [J].
Graff, J ;
Brinch, K ;
Madsen, JL .
CLINICAL PHYSIOLOGY, 2001, 21 (02) :253-259
[10]  
Herrerias JM, 2003, ENDOSCOPY, V35, P564