Effect of fluticasone in severe polyposis

被引:120
作者
Lund, VJ
Flood, J
Sykes, AP
Richards, DH
机构
[1] Royal Natl Throat Nose & Ear Hosp, Inst Laryngol & Otol, London WC1X 8DA, England
[2] Glaxo Wellcome Inc, Greenford, Middx, England
[3] Glaxo Wellcome Res & Dev Ltd, Uxbridge, Middx, England
关键词
D O I
10.1001/archotol.124.5.513
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Objectives: To investigate the effect of intranasal corticosteroids in the treatment of polyps in patients with severe polyposis listed for surgical treatment and to determine the treatment effect on the progression of the disease. Design: A double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, 12-week study at a single center. Setting: A tertiary referral center in London, England. Patients: Thirty-four patients with severe polyposis listed for endoscopic surgical treatment. Intervention: By random allocation, fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray (FPANS), 200 mu g twice a day; beclomethasone dipropionate aqueous nasal spray, 200 mu g twice a day; or placebo nasal spray twice a day was administered. Patients received 2 actuations to each nostril in the morning and in the evening. Main Outcome Measures: Efficacy end points were the need for polypectomy at the end of treatment, the results of acoustic rhinometry, the polyp score, the peak nasal inspiratory flow rate, and an assessment of symptoms. Results: The polyp score was significantly decreased in the FPANS-treated group (P less than or equal to.01). The nasal cavity volume was significantly increased in both the FPANS-treated group and the group receiving beclomethasone compared with placebo (P less than or equal to.01) at the end of treatment. The percentage change in the mean morning peak nasal inspiratory flow rate was greater in the FPANS-treated group, with a significant effect observed at week 2 (P=.01). Nasal blockage was significantly decreased in both active groups compared with the group receiving placebo. No significant difference was observed between the treatment groups in the number of patients requiring polypectomy. Conclusions: Fluticasone and beclomethasone aqueous nasal sprays are effective in treating the symptoms of severe nasal polyps. There was some evidence that the group treated with FPANS responded more quickly to intervention and that the magnitude of the response was greater than in the group receiving beclomethasone.
引用
收藏
页码:513 / 518
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   HISTOPATHOLOGICAL EXAMINATIONS OF NASAL POLYPS OF DIFFERENT ETIOLOGY [J].
BAUMGARTEN, C ;
KUNKEL, G ;
RUDOLPH, R ;
STAUD, RD ;
SPERNER, I ;
GELDERBLOM, H .
ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY-ARCHIV FUR OHREN-NASEN-UND KEHLKOPFHEILKUNDE, 1980, 226 (03) :187-197
[2]  
DEUSCHL H, 1977, Rhinology (Utrecht), V15, P17
[3]   DEVELOPMENT OF THE UNIVERSITY-OF-PENNSYLVANIA SMELL IDENTIFICATION TEST - A STANDARDIZED MICROENCAPSULATED TEST OF OLFACTORY FUNCTION [J].
DOTY, RL ;
SHAMAN, P ;
DANN, M .
PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 1984, 32 (03) :489-502
[4]  
DRETTNER B, 1982, Rhinology (Utrecht), V20, P149
[5]   ACOUSTIC RHINOMETRY USED AS A METHOD TO MONITOR THE EFFECT OF INTRAMUSCULAR INJECTION OF STEROID IN THE TREATMENT OF NASAL POLYPS [J].
ELBROND, O ;
FELDING, JU ;
GUSTAVSEN, KM .
JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 1991, 105 (03) :178-180
[6]   BUDESONIDE NASAL SPRAY AS PROPHYLACTIC TREATMENT AFTER POLYPECTOMY (A DOUBLE-BLIND CLINICAL-TRIAL) [J].
HARTWIG, S ;
LINDEN, M ;
LAURENT, C ;
VARGO, AK ;
LINDQVIST, N .
JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 1988, 102 (02) :148-151
[7]   ACOUSTIC RHINOMETRY - EVALUATION OF NASAL CAVITY GEOMETRY BY ACOUSTIC REFLECTION [J].
HILBERG, O ;
JACKSON, AC ;
SWIFT, DL ;
PEDERSEN, OF .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 1989, 66 (01) :295-303
[8]   Fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray in the treatment of nasal polyposis [J].
Holmberg, K ;
Juliusson, S ;
Balder, B ;
Smith, DL ;
Richards, DH ;
Karlsson, G .
ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY, 1997, 78 (03) :270-276
[9]  
HOLMBERG K, 1994, EUR RESPIR REV, V4, P260
[10]   Response of olfactory acuity to surgical stress [J].
Holmstrom, M ;
Lund, VJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RHINOLOGY, 1996, 10 (01) :1-4