On principle-based evaluation of extension-based argumentation semantics

被引:198
作者
Baroni, Pietro [1 ]
Giacomin, Massimiliano [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Brescia, Dipartimento Elettr Automaz, I-25123 Brescia, Italy
关键词
argumentation frameworks; argumentation semantics; skepticism;
D O I
10.1016/j.artint.2007.04.004
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The increasing variety of semantics proposed in the context of Dung's theory of argumentation makes more and more inadequate the example-based approach commonly adopted for evaluating and comparing different semantics. To fill this gap, this paper provides two main contributions. First, a set of general criteria for semantics evaluation is introduced by proposing a formal counterpart to several intuitive notions related to the concepts of maximality, defense, directionality, and skepticism. Then, the proposed criteria are applied in a systematic way to a representative set of argumentation semantics available in the literature, namely grounded, complete, preferred, stable, serni-stable, ideal, prudent, and CF2 semantics. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:675 / 700
页数:26
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments [J].
Amgoud, L ;
Cayrol, C .
ANNALS OF MATHEMATICS AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2002, 34 (1-3) :197-215
[2]   SCC-recursiveness: a general schema for argumentation semantics [J].
Baroni, P ;
Giacomin, M ;
Guida, G .
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2005, 168 (1-2) :162-210
[3]  
Baroni P, 2003, LECT NOTES ARTIF INT, V2711, P440
[4]  
Baroni P, 2004, PROC 4THWORKSHOP COM, P47
[5]  
BARONI P, 2007, PRINCIPLE BASED EVAL
[6]  
BARONI P, 2005, P 8 EUR C SYMB QUANT, P3329
[7]   Persuasion in practical argument using value-based argumentation frameworks [J].
Bench-Capon, TJM .
JOURNAL OF LOGIC AND COMPUTATION, 2003, 13 (03) :429-448
[8]  
CAMINADA M, 2006, P 10 EUR C LOG ART I, P11
[9]  
CAMINADA M, 2005, P 20 NAT C ART INT A, P608
[10]  
Caminada M, 2006, FR ART INT, V144, P121