Zinc gluconate lozenges for treating the common cold in children - A randomized controlled trial

被引:77
作者
Macknin, ML
Piedmonte, M
Calendine, C
Janosky, J
Wald, E
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Dept Pediat & Adolescent Med, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[2] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Dept Biostat & Epidemiol, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Dept Family Med & Clin Epidemiol, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA
来源
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | 1998年 / 279卷 / 24期
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jama.279.24.1962
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Context.-The common cold is one of the most frequently occurring illnesses and is responsible for substantial morbidity and economic loss. Biochemical evidence suggests that zinc may be an effective treatment, and zinc gluconate glycine (ZGG) lozenges have been shown to reduce the duration of cold symptoms in adults. Objective.-To determine the efficacy of ZGG treatment of colds in children and adolescents. Design.-A randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled study. Setting.-Two suburban school districts in Cleveland, Ohio. Patients.-A total of 249 students in grades 1 through 12 were enrolled within the first 24 hours of experiencing at least 2 of 9 symptoms of the common cold. Intervention.-Zinc lozenges, 10 mg, orally dissolved, 5 times a day (in grades 1-6) or 6 times a day (in grades 7-12), Main Outcome Measures.-Time to resolution of cold symptoms based on subjective daily symptom scores for cough, headache, hoarseness, muscle ache, nasal congestion, nasal drainage, scratchy throat, sore throat, and sneezing. Results.-Time to resolution of all cold symptoms did not differ significantly between students receiving zinc (n = 124) and those receiving placebo (n = 125) (median, 9 days; 95% confidence interval [CI], 8-9 days; median, 9 days, 95% CI, 7-10 days, respectively; P=.71). There were no significant differences in the time to resolution of any of the 9 symptoms studied. Compared with controls, more students in the zinc group reported adverse effects (88.6% vs 79.8%; P=.06); bad taste (60.2% vs 37.9%; P=.001); nausea (29.3% vs 16.1%; P=.01); mouth, tongue, or throat discomfort (36.6% vs 24.2%; P=.03); and diarrhea (10.6% vs 4.0%; P=.05). Conclusions.-In this community-based, randomized controlled trial, ZGG lozenges were not effective in treating cold symptoms in children and adolescents. Further studies with virologic testing are needed to clarify what role, if any, zinc may play in treating cold symptoms.
引用
收藏
页码:1962 / 1967
页数:6
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   PROPHYLAXIS AND TREATMENT OF RHINOVIRUS COLDS WITH ZINC GLUCONATE LOZENGES [J].
ALNAKIB, W ;
HIGGINS, PG ;
BARROW, I ;
BATSTONE, G ;
TYRRELL, DAJ .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 1987, 20 (06) :893-901
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1964, Illness in the Home: A Study of 25,000 Illnesses in a Group of Cleveland Families
[3]  
BASHFORD CL, 1986, J BIOL CHEM, V261, P9300
[4]   A CONFIDENCE-INTERVAL FOR THE MEDIAN SURVIVAL-TIME [J].
BROOKMEYER, R ;
CROWLEY, J .
BIOMETRICS, 1982, 38 (01) :29-41
[5]   THE COMMON COLD - CONTROL [J].
COUCH, RB .
JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1984, 150 (02) :167-173
[6]  
COX DR, 1972, J R STAT SOC B, V34, P187
[7]   FAILURE OF EFFERVESCENT ZINC ACETATE LOZENGES TO ALTER THE COURSE OF UPPER RESPIRATORY-TRACT INFECTIONS IN AUSTRALIAN ADULTS [J].
DOUGLAS, RM ;
MILES, HB ;
MOORE, BW ;
RYAN, P ;
PINNOCK, CB .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1987, 31 (08) :1263-1265
[8]   REDUCTION IN DURATION OF COMMON COLDS BY ZINC GLUCONATE LOZENGES IN A DOUBLE-BLIND-STUDY [J].
EBY, GA ;
DAVIS, DR ;
HALCOMB, WW .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1984, 25 (01) :20-24
[9]   EFFICIENCY OF COXS LIKELIHOOD FUNCTION FOR CENSORED DATA [J].
EFRON, B .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1977, 72 (359) :557-565
[10]   2 RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS OF ZINC GLUCONATE LOZENGE THERAPY OF EXPERIMENTALLY INDUCED RHINOVIRUS COLDS [J].
FARR, BM ;
CONNER, EM ;
BETTS, RF ;
OLESKE, J ;
MINNEFOR, A ;
GWALTNEY, JM .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1987, 31 (08) :1183-1187