Randomized, double-blind, phase III, pivotal field trial of the comparative immunogenicity, safety, and tolerability of two yellow fever 17D vaccines (ARILVAX™ and YF-VAX®) in healthy infants and children in Peru

被引:66
作者
Belmusto-Worn, VE
Sanchez, JL
McCarthy, K
Nichols, R
Bautista, CT
Magill, AJ
Pastor-Cauna, G
Echevarria, C
Laguna-Torres, VA
Samame, BK
Baldeon, ME
Burans, JP
Olson, JG
Bedford, P
Kitchener, S
Monath, TP
机构
[1] USN, Med Res Ctr Detachment, Lima, Peru
[2] Sutter Inst Med Res, Sacramento, CA USA
[3] Walter Reed Army Inst Res, Div Retrovirol & Commun Dis, Washington, DC USA
[4] Walter Reed Army Inst Res, Div Immunol, Washington, DC USA
[5] Acambis Res Ltd, Cambridge, England
[6] Minist Hlth, Sullana, Peru
[7] Acambis Inc, Cambridge, MA USA
关键词
D O I
10.4269/ajtmh.2005.72.189
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 [公共卫生与预防医学]; 120402 [社会医学与卫生事业管理];
摘要
We conducted a randomized, double-blind, phase III yellow fever (YF) vaccine trial among 1,107 healthy children in Sullana in northern Peru. The safety and efficacy (by measurement of geometric mean neutralizing antibody titer responses) were determined for two YF vaccines, ARILVAX(TM) (n = 738) and YF-VAX(R) (n = 369). Seroconversion rates were higher (94.9%) in ARILVAX(TM) than in YF-VAX(R) (90.6%) recipients. The two-sided 95% confidence interval (YF-VAX(R)-ARILVAX(TM),1) was (-12.8% to -2.5%), indicating that the higher seroconversion rate for Arilvax(TM) was significant. Post-vaccination (30-day) mean log,(, neutralization indices were found to be similar for both products: 1.32 for ARILVAX(TM), and 1.26 for YF-VAX(R)(P = 0.1404, by analysis of variance). A similar number of subjects in each group reported at least one adverse event (AE); 441 (59.8%) for ARILVAX(TM) versus 211 (59.9%) for YF-VAX((R)). Most (591- 96.7%) of these were of a mild nature and resolved without treatment. There were no treatment-related serious AEs. This is the first randomized, double-blind comparison of two YF vaccines in a pediatric population-, both vaccines were shown to be highly immunogenic and well-tolerated.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 197
页数:9
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]
[Anonymous], 1966, J AMER MED ASSOC, V198, P671
[2]
Barwick RS, 2004, EMERGING INFECTIONS 6, P25
[3]
Bryant J, 2003, EMERG INFECT DIS, V9, P926
[4]
CARTER K, 1998, REUN EXP ESTR PREV C
[5]
The duration of immunity following vaccination with the 17D strain of yellow fever virus [J].
Fox, JP ;
Cabral, AS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYGIENE, 1943, 37 (01) :93-120
[6]
STABILIZED 17D STRAIN YELLOW-FEVER VACCINE - DOSE-RESPONSE STUDIES, CLINICAL REACTIONS AND EFFECTS ON HEPATIC FUNCTION [J].
FREESTONE, DS ;
FERRIS, RD ;
WEINBERG, AL ;
KELLY, A .
JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL STANDARDIZATION, 1977, 5 (03) :181-186
[7]
Anaphylaxis from yellow fever vaccine [J].
Kelso, JM ;
Mootrey, GT ;
Tsai, TF .
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1999, 103 (04) :698-701
[9]
Advanced age a risk factor for illness temporally associated with yellow fever vaccination [J].
Martin, M ;
Weld, LH ;
Tsai, TF ;
Mootrey, GT ;
Chen, RT ;
Niu, M ;
Cetron, MS .
EMERGING INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2001, 7 (06) :945-951
[10]
YELLOW-FEVER VACCINE - DIRECT CHALLENGE OF MONKEYS GIVEN GRADED DOSES OF 17D VACCINE [J].
MASON, RA ;
TAURASO, NM ;
SPERTZEL, RO ;
GINN, RK .
APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 1973, 25 (04) :539-544