Sources of nitrogen to estuaries in the United States

被引:86
作者
Castro, MS
Driscoll, CT
Jordan, TE
Reay, WG
Boynton, WR
机构
[1] Appalachian Lab, Frostburg, MD 21532 USA
[2] Syracuse Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Syracuse, NY 13244 USA
[3] Smithsonian Environm Res Ctr, Edgewater, MD 21037 USA
[4] Coll William & Mary, Virginia Inst Marine Sci, Gloucester Point, VA 23062 USA
[5] Univ Maryland, Ctr Environm Sci, Chesapeake Biol Lab, Solomons, MD 20688 USA
来源
ESTUARIES | 2003年 / 26卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.1007/BF02711991
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to quantify the nitrogen (N) inputs to 34 estuaries on the Atlantic and Gulf Coasts of the United States. Total nitrogen (TN) inputs ranged from 1 kg N ha(-1) yr(-1) for Upper Laguna Madre, Texas, to 49 kg N ha(-1) yr(-1) for Massachusetts Bay, Massachusetts. TN inputs to 11 of the 34 estuaries were dominated by urban N sources (point sources and septic systems) and nonpoint source N runoff (5% of total); point sources accounted for 36-86% of the TN inputs to these 11 urban-dominated estuaries. TN inputs to 20 of the 34 estuaries were dominated by agricultural N sources; N fertilization was the dominant source (46% of the total), followed by manure (32% of the total) and N fixation by crops (16% of the total). Atmospheric deposition (runoff from watershed plus direct deposition to the surface of the estuary) was the dominant N source for three estuaries (Barnegat Bay, New Jersey: 64%; St. Catherines-Sapelo, Georgia: 72%; and Barataria Bay, Louisiana: 53%). Six estuaries had atmospheric contributions 30% of the TN inputs (Casco Bay, Maine: 43%; Buzzards Bay, Massachusetts: 30%; Great Bay, New Jersey: 40%; Chesapeake Bay: 30%; Terrebonne-Timbalier Bay, Louisiana: 59%; and Upper Laguna Madre: 41%). Results from our study suggest that reductions in N loadings to estuaries should be accomplished by implementing watershed specific programs that target the dominant N sources.
引用
收藏
页码:803 / 814
页数:12
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
Alexander R.B., 2000, ASSESSMENT NITROGEN, P119
[2]   Effect of stream channel size on the delivery of nitrogen to the Gulf of Mexico [J].
Alexander, RB ;
Smith, RA ;
Schwarz, GE .
NATURE, 2000, 403 (6771) :758-761
[3]  
Behbehani, 1986, COASTAL EUTROPHICATI, P97
[4]   INPUTS, TRANSFORMATIONS, AND TRANSPORT OF NITROGEN AND PHOSPHORUS IN CHESAPEAKE BAY AND SELECTED TRIBUTARIES [J].
BOYNTON, WR ;
GARBER, JH ;
SUMMERS, R ;
KEMP, WM .
ESTUARIES, 1995, 18 (1B) :285-314
[5]  
Castro M.S., 2000, ASSESSMENT NITROGEN, P77
[6]   THE ROLE AND CONTROL OF NUTRIENTS IN CHESAPEAKE BAY [J].
DELIA, CF ;
HARDING, LW ;
LEFFLER, M ;
MACKIERNAN, GB .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1992, 26 (12) :2635-2644
[7]  
FISHER DC, 1991, AMBIO, V20, P102
[8]  
GOOLSBY DA, 2000, EOS T, P29
[9]  
Howarth R. W., 2000, CLEAN COASTAL WATERS
[10]   Regional nitrogen budgets and riverine N&P fluxes for the drainages to the North Atlantic Ocean: Natural and human influences [J].
Howarth, RW ;
Billen, G ;
Swaney, D ;
Townsend, A ;
Jaworski, N ;
Lajtha, K ;
Downing, JA ;
Elmgren, R ;
Caraco, N ;
Jordan, T ;
Berendse, F ;
Freney, J ;
Kudeyarov, V ;
Murdoch, P ;
Zhu, ZL .
BIOGEOCHEMISTRY, 1996, 35 (01) :75-139