Retrospective analyses of pooled data from CREST I and CREST II trials for treatment of cocaine dependence

被引:30
作者
Elkashef, A
Holmes, TH
Bloch, DA
Shoptaw, S
Kampman, K
Reid, MS
Somoza, ER
Ciraulo, D
Rotrosen, J
Leiderman, D
Montgomery, A
Vocci, F
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Hlth Res & Policy, Div Biostat, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] NIDA, Div Pharmacotherapies & Med Consequences Drug Abu, NIH, Dept Hlth & Human Serv, Bethesda, MD USA
[3] US FDA, Ctr Drug Evaluat & Res, Rockville, MD 20857 USA
[4] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Integrated Substance Abuse Programs, Los Angeles, CA USA
[5] Friends Res Inst Inc, Los Angeles, CA USA
[6] Philadelphia Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Philadelphia, PA USA
[7] NYU, Sch Med, New York, NY USA
[8] VA New York Harbor Healthcare Syst, Dept Psychiat, New York, NY USA
[9] Cincinnati VA Med Ctr, Cincinnati, OH USA
[10] Univ Cincinnati, Coll Med, CinARC, Cincinnati, OH USA
[11] Boston Univ, Sch Med, Div Psychiat, Boston, MA 02118 USA
[12] VA Boston Healthcare Syst, MDRU, Boston, MA 02118 USA
关键词
cocaine; pharmacotherapy; statistics;
D O I
10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.00986.x
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Aim To analyze pooled data from the Cocaine Rapid Evaluation Screening Trial (CREST). Pooling data from these small pilot trials into four major drug classes permitted data exploration for treatment and covariate effects with increased sample size. Design Small pilot trials were conducted to screen fifteen medications as prospective treatments for cocaine dependence. Studies included a flexible 2-week to 4-week screening/baseline period followed by an 8-week randomized treatment condition. Participants were randomized equally to one of up to three active medications or placebo. Setting Five Medications Development Research Units at the five academic centers of University of Cincinnati, New York University, University of Pennsylvania, University of California Los Angeles and Boston University. Participants The pooled data set consisted of 3 5 7 total subjects. Standardized inclusion and exclusion criteria were employed in subject selection to enhance consistency of cocaine-dependent study participants across all sites (see reports on individual trials in this supplement for details). All participants provided at least two urine samples that were positive for cocaine metabolite during a two-week period prior to being randomized. Intervention All subjects in these trials, those randomized to placebo and active medications, received active treatment in the form of evidence-based cognitive behavioral therapy. Measures Quantitative urine benzoylecgonine (BE), self-report of cocaine use, and total Brief Substance Craving Scale (BSCS) scores were compared between each class of medication and its matched-placebo group. Findings Regression analysis of pooled data did not identify any statistically significant differences between treatment and matched-placebo for any of the four classes. Exploration of the effects of baseline covariates indicated that gender and African American status were associated significantly with outcome. Female gender was consistently associated with poorer outcomes for medication and placebo groups, while the direction of association between African American status and outcome differed by treatment groups. Retention was also examined: dropout rates may have been somewhat higher for placebo than treatment. groups during the early active-treatment period. Classification trees were used to identify characteristics of subjects who were abstinent for at least two weeks during the eight-week trial; only 4.0% of females while 17.9% of males achieved this criterion. Conclusions Results presented here may prove useful for planning future clinical trials for therapies targeting cocaine dependence.
引用
收藏
页码:91 / 101
页数:11
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   EMPIRICAL-COMPARISON OF APPROACHES TO FORMING STRATA - USING CLASSIFICATION TREES TO ADJUST FOR COVARIATES [J].
BLOCH, DA ;
SEGAL, MR .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1989, 84 (408) :897-905
[2]  
Breiman L., 1998, CLASSIFICATION REGRE
[3]   HAMILTON-ANXIETY-RATING-SCALE INTERVIEW GUIDE - JOINT INTERVIEW AND TEST-RETEST METHODS FOR INTERRATER RELIABILITY [J].
BRUSS, GS ;
GRUENBERG, AM ;
GOLDSTEIN, RD ;
BARBER, JP .
PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 1994, 53 (02) :191-202
[4]   Pharmacological treatment of cocaine dependence: a systematic review [J].
de Lima, MS ;
Soares, GD ;
Reisser, AAP ;
Farrell, M .
ADDICTION, 2002, 97 (08) :931-949
[5]   COCAINE REDUCTION IN UNMOTIVATED CRACK USERS USING CARBAMAZEPINE VERSUS PLACEBO IN A SHORT-TERM, DOUBLE-BLIND CROSSOVER DESIGN [J].
HALIKAS, JA ;
CROSBY, RD ;
CARLSON, GA ;
CREA, F ;
GRAVES, NM ;
BOWERS, LD .
CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 1991, 50 (01) :81-95
[6]  
HAMILTON M, 1967, BRIT J SOC CLIN PSYC, V6, P278, DOI [10.1111/j.2044-8260.1967.tb00530.x, DOI 10.1111/J.2044-8260.1967.TB00530.X]
[7]   Cocaine Rapid Efficacy Screening Trial (CREST): a paradigm for the controlled evaluation of candidate medications for cocaine dependence [J].
Leiderman, DB ;
Shoptaw, S ;
Montgomery, A ;
Bloch, DA ;
Elkashef, A ;
LoCastro, J ;
Vocci, F .
ADDICTION, 2005, 100 :1-11
[8]  
LIANG KY, 1986, BIOMETRIKA, V73, P13, DOI 10.1093/biomet/73.1.13
[9]   Integration of research in pharmacotherapy for addictive disease: Where are we? Where are we going? [J].
Ling, W ;
Shoptaw, S .
JOURNAL OF ADDICTIVE DISEASES, 1997, 16 (04) :83-102
[10]   THE 5TH EDITION OF THE ADDICTION SEVERITY INDEX [J].
MCLELLAN, AT ;
KUSHNER, H ;
METZGER, D ;
PETERS, R ;
SMITH, I ;
GRISSOM, G ;
PETTINATI, H ;
ARGERIOU, M .
JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT, 1992, 9 (03) :199-213