Using combined-currency prices to lower consumers' perceived cost

被引:55
作者
Drèze, X [1 ]
Nunes, JC
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Wharton Sch, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Univ So Calif, Marshall Sch Business, Los Angeles, CA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1509/jmkr.41.1.59.25085
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The increasing popularity of loyalty programs and related marketing promotions has resulted in the introduction of several new currencies (e.g., frequent flier miles, Diner's Club "Club Rewards") that consumers accumulate, budget, save, and spend much as they do traditional paper money. As consumers are increasingly able to pay for goods and services such as airline travel, hotel stays, and groceries in various combinations of currencies, an understanding of how shoppers respond to "combined-currency pricing" is important for marketers. This research is the first to explore how consumers evaluate transactions that involve combined-currency prices, or prices issued in multiple currencies (e.g., $39 and 16,000 miles). The authors present a formal mathematical proof that outlines the conditions under which a price that comprises payments delivered in different currencies can be superior to a standard, single-currency price, either by lowering the psychological or perceived cost associated with a particular revenue objective (i.e., price) or by raising the amount of revenue collected given a particular perceived cost. Three studies, in which respondents evaluate and choose among prices issued in single and combined currencies, offer both experimental and empirical support.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 72
页数:14
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Parameter-free elicitation of utility and probability weighting functions [J].
Abdellaoui, M .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2000, 46 (11) :1497-1512
[2]  
[Anonymous], CHEM ENG PROG
[3]  
DAVIDSON D, 1967, DECISION MAKING, P170
[4]  
Davies, 1996, HIST MONEY ANCIENT T
[5]  
ELLIOTT C, 2003, US NEWS WORLD R 0310, P65
[6]   UTILITY-ASSESSMENT METHODS [J].
FARQUHAR, PH .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1984, 30 (11) :1283-1300
[7]   Measuring the utility of losses by means of the tradeoff method [J].
Fennema, H ;
Van Assen, M .
JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 1998, 17 (03) :277-295
[8]  
Fishburn PC., 1979, DECISION SCI, V10, P503, DOI [10.1111/j.1540-5915.1979.tb00043.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1540-5915.1979.TB00043.X]
[9]   THE UTILITY ANALYSIS OF CHOICES INVOLVING RISK [J].
Friedman, Milton ;
Savage, L. J. .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1948, 56 (04) :279-304
[10]   Goals as reference points [J].
Heath, C ;
Larrick, RP ;
Wu, G .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1999, 38 (01) :79-109