Efficacy and tolerability of ophthalmic epinastine assessed using the conjunctival antigen challenge model in patients with a history of allergic conjunctivitis

被引:48
作者
Abelson, MB
Gomes, P
Crampton, HJ
Schiffman, RM
Bradford, RR
Whitcup, SM
机构
[1] Allergan Pharmaceut Inc, Irvine, CA 92623 USA
[2] Ophthalm Res Associates, N Andover, MA USA
[3] Schepens Eye Res Inst, Boston, MA USA
[4] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA USA
关键词
conjunctival antigen challenge; epinastine; allergic conjunctivitis; ophthalmic solution;
D O I
10.1016/S0149-2918(04)90004-5
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background: Epinastine hydrochloride is a nonsedating antihistamine with a high affinity for histamine H-1 receptors, together with mast cell-stabilizing and anti-inflammatory activities. Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and tolerability of topically administered ophthalmic epinastine using the conjunctival antigen challenge (CAC) model in patients with a history of allergic conjunctivitis. Methods: This prospective, single-center, randomized, double-masked, vehicle-controlled, Phase III clinical trial was conducted at the Ophthalmic Research Associates study center (North Andover, Massachusetts) from November 2000 to January 2001. Eligible participants were asymptomatic but had a history of allergic conjunctivitis and had positive CAC reactions at the initial screening (week 0) and at a confirmation visit (week 1). Patients were randomly assigned by eye to receive epinastine hydrochloride 0.05% ophthalmic solution in 1 eye and vehicle in the contralateral eye. Each eye received 1 drop of study medication 15 minutes before antigen application (onset challenge; week 3) or 8 hours before antigen application (duration challenge; week 5). Primary end points were ocular itching and conjunctival hyperemia. Itching was recorded 3, 5, and 10 minutes after antigen challenge. Hyperemia was recorded 5, 10, and 20 minutes after antigen challenge, as were secondary end points, which included eyelid swelling, episcleral and ciliary hyperemia, chemosis, tearing, and ocular mucous discharge. Tolerability was assessed by patient interview and slit-lamp biomicroscopy. Results: Sixty-seven patients (37 females, 30 males; mean [SD] age, 38.4 [14.2] years [range, 12-67 years]) were included in the study. Mean severity scores for the following signs and-symptoms were significantly lower with epinastine compared with vehicle at all time points after onset and duration challenges: ocular itching (P < 0.001); eyelid swelling (P < 0.001); conjunctival (P < 0.001), episcleral (P < 0.001), and ciliary hyperemia (P < 0.001); and chemosis (P <= 0.009). The percentage of eyes with tearing was significantly lower with epinastine compared with vehicle at all time points (P <= 0.021), except at 5 minutes after the duration challenge. Adverse events (AEs), reported for 7.5% (5/67) of patients, included only symptoms of upper respiratory tract infection. No ocular or treatment-related AEs were reported. Conclusions: In this CAC model, multiple signs and symptoms of allergic conjunctivitis were significantly reduced by instillation of epinastine compared with vehicle. Epinastine showed prompt onset (3 minutes) and long duration of action (>= 8 hours). The tolerability of epinastine was similar to that of vehicle. Copyright (C) 2004 Excerpta Medica, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:35 / 47
页数:13
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Comparison of the conjunctival allergen challenge model with the environmental model of allergic conjunctivitis [J].
Abelson, MB .
ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1999, 77 :38-42
[2]   CONJUNCTIVAL ALLERGEN CHALLENGE - A CLINICAL APPROACH TO STUDYING ALLERGIC CONJUNCTIVITIS [J].
ABELSON, MB ;
CHAMBERS, WA ;
SMITH, LM .
ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1990, 108 (01) :84-88
[3]  
Abelson MB, 2000, ALLERGIC DIS EYE
[4]   In vitro investigations with the histamine H1 receptor antagonist, epinastine (WAL 801 CL), on isolated human allergic effector cells [J].
Amon, U ;
Gibbs, BF ;
Buss, G ;
Nitschke, M .
INFLAMMATION RESEARCH, 2000, 49 (03) :112-116
[5]   Tear and conjunctival changes during the allergen-induced early- and late-phase responses [J].
Bacon, AS ;
Ahluwalia, P ;
Irani, AM ;
Schwartz, LB ;
Holgate, ST ;
Church, MK ;
McGill, JI .
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2000, 106 (05) :948-954
[6]   Allergic and immunologic disorders of the eye. Part II: Ocular allergy [J].
Bielory, L .
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2000, 106 (06) :1019-1032
[7]  
ENDO T, 1995, OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, V38, P800
[8]  
FUGNER A, 1988, ARZNEIMITTEL-FORSCH, V38-2, P1446
[9]   INHIBITORY EFFECT OF EPINASTINE ON SUPEROXIDE GENERATION BY RAT NEUTROPHILS [J].
FUKUISHI, N ;
KAN, T ;
HIROSE, K ;
AKAGI, R ;
AKAGI, M .
JAPANESE JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 1995, 68 (04) :449-452
[10]   ANTIALLERGIC EFFECT OF EPINASTINE (WAL-801-CL) ON IMMEDIATE HYPERSENSITIVITY REACTIONS .1. ELUCIDATION OF THE MECHANISM FOR HISTAMINE-RELEASE INHIBITION [J].
KAMEI, C ;
AKAGI, M ;
MIO, M ;
KITAZUMI, K ;
IZUSHI, K ;
MASAKI, S ;
TASAKA, K .
IMMUNOPHARMACOLOGY AND IMMUNOTOXICOLOGY, 1992, 14 (1-2) :191-205