Monitoring of cyclosporine 2-hour post-dose levels in heart transplantation: Improvement in clinical outcomes

被引:29
作者
Delgado, DH
Rao, V
Hamel, J
Miriuka, S
Cusimano, RJ
Ross, HJ
机构
[1] Toronto Gen Hosp, Div Cardiol & Heart Transplant, Toronto, ON M5G 2N2, Canada
[2] Toronto Gen Hosp, Div Cardiovasc Surg, Toronto, ON M5G 2N2, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.healun.2004.08.002
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Cyclosporine 2-hour post-dose (C2) monitoring is. predictive of outcomes in solid-organ transplants. The purpose of this study was to determine C2 levels at various time points after heart transplantation and determine whether trough ( CO) or C2 better predicts clinical outcomes. Methods: This was a 2-phase prospective study with paired determinations of cyclosporine levels at CO and C2 in 58 heart transplant patients (46 men; mean-age, 56 years). Phase I (6-month follow-up): cyclosporine monitored according to C0 levels (C2 blinded). Phase II (6-month follow-up): cyclosporine monitored according to C2 levels (C0 blinded). Clinical outcomes assessed were severe infections,. rejection score, and renal dysfunction. Results: No differences were observed in renal function between the phases. In Phase 1, 8 infections (4 severe) and in Phase 11, 6 infections (2 severe) were detected. During Phase 1, the CO levels did not correlate (p = .96) with the presence (195 +/- 121 ng/ml) or not (197 +/- 100 ng/ml) of rejection. During Phase II, CO levels did, not correlate (p = .88) with the presence (204 +/- 85 ng/ml) or not (209 138 ngln-A) of rejection. During Phase 1, C2. levels did correlate (p = 0.022) with the presence (777 +/- 326 ng/ml) or not (1,015 +/- 422 ng/ml) of rejection. During Phase II, higher C2 levels showed a significant correlation (p = 0.63) with no rejection (967 470 ng/ml vs 765 297 ng/ml, no rejection vs rejection, respectively). Conclusion: High C2 levels were associated with less episodes of acute cellular rejection in patients post-heart transplantation. Monitoring with C2 levels is feasible and safe in terms of preservation of renal function and infection rates.
引用
收藏
页码:1343 / 1346
页数:4
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]   Comparison of neoral dose monitoring with cyclosporine trough levels versus 2-hr postdose levels in stable liver transplant patients [J].
Cantarovich, M ;
Barkun, JS ;
Tchervenkov, JI ;
Besner, JG ;
Aspeslet, L ;
Metrakos, P .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1998, 66 (12) :1621-1627
[2]  
Cantarovich M, 1998, CLIN TRANSPLANT, V12, P243
[3]   Clinical benefit of neoral dose monitoring with cyclosporine 2-HR post-dose levels compared with trough levels in stable heart transplant patients [J].
Cantarovich, M ;
Elstein, E ;
de Varennes, B ;
Barkun, JS .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1999, 68 (12) :1839-1842
[4]   Impact of cyclosporine 2-h level and mycophenolate mofetil dose on clinical outcomes in de novo heart transplant patients receiving anti-thymocyte globulin induction [J].
Cantarovich, M ;
Giannetti, N ;
Cecere, R .
CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 17 (02) :144-150
[5]   Neoral monitoring: Limitations of trough level monitoring and the potential role of limited sampling strategies [J].
Cole, EH .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2000, 32 (07) :1556-1558
[6]   Peak cyclosporine levels (Cmax) correlate with freedom from liver graft rejection -: Results of a prospective, randomized comparison of neoral and sandimmune for liver transplantation (NOF-8) [J].
Grant, D ;
Kneteman, N ;
Tchervenkov, J ;
Roy, A ;
Murphy, G ;
Tan, A ;
Hendricks, L ;
Guilbault, N ;
Levy, G .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1999, 67 (08) :1133-1137
[7]   A randomized, prospective multicenter pharmacoepidemiologic study of cyclosporine microemulsion in stable renal graft recipients [J].
Keown, P ;
Landsberg, D ;
Halloran, P ;
Shoker, A ;
Rush, D ;
Jeffery, J ;
Russell, D ;
Stiller, C ;
Muirhead, N ;
Cole, E ;
Paul, L ;
Zaltzman, J ;
Loertscher, R ;
Daloze, P ;
Dandavino, R ;
Boucher, A ;
Handa, P ;
Lawen, J ;
Belitsky, P ;
Parfrey, P .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1996, 62 (12) :1744-1752
[8]  
LEVY G, 2002, TRANSPLANTATION, V763, P840
[9]   Neoral monitoring by simplified sparse sampling area under the concentration-time curve - Its relationship to acute rejection and cyclosporine nephrotoxicity early after kidney transplantation [J].
Mahalati, K ;
Belitsky, P ;
Sketris, I ;
West, K ;
Panek, R .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1999, 68 (01) :55-62
[10]   Cyclosporine monitoring in patients with renal transplants: Two- or three-point methods that estimate area under the curve are superior to trough levels in predicting drug exposure [J].
Primmett, DRN ;
Levine, M ;
Kovarik, JM ;
Mueller, EA ;
Keown, PA .
THERAPEUTIC DRUG MONITORING, 1998, 20 (03) :276-283