The 15D instrument of health-related quality of life: properties and applications

被引:915
作者
Sintonen, H [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Dept Publ Hlth, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland
关键词
15D; cost-effectiveness analysis; cost-utility analysis; economic evaluation; health-related quality of life; health status; QALY; quality of life; sensitivity; utility;
D O I
10.3109/07853890109002086
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The 15D is a generic, comprehensive, 15-dimensional, standardized, self-administered measure of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) that can be used both as a profile and single index score measure. This paper examines the acceptability, reliability, validity, discriminatory power and responsiveness to change of its health state descriptive system and valuation system and presents some examples of applications, As a profile measure on roughly comparable dimensions the 15D performs equally well as the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) and SF-20, in some respects even better, and clearly better than EQ-5D, The remaining nine to ten dimensions of the 15D provide a large reserve in terms of discriminatory power and responsiveness to change, The valuation system is based on an application of the multiattribute utility theory. The single index score (15D score) on a 0-1 scale, representing the overall HRQoL, is calculated from the health state descriptive system by using a set of population-based preference or utility weights, The 15D scores are shown to be highly reliable, sensitive and responsive to change, generalisable at least in Western-type societies, and particularly valid for deriving quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained for resource allocation purposes. The instrument is recommended by the Washington Panel and is available in several languages for clinical economic evaluation and population studies.
引用
收藏
页码:328 / 336
页数:9
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Quality of life in pre-adolescence: A 17-dimensional health-related measure (17D) [J].
Apajasalo, M ;
Rautonen, J ;
Holmberg, C ;
Sinkkonen, J ;
Aalberg, V ;
Pihko, H ;
Siimes, MA ;
Kaitila, I ;
Makela, A ;
Erkkila, K ;
Sintonen, H .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 1996, 5 (06) :532-538
[2]   Quality of life in early adolescence: A sixteen-dimensional health-related measure (16D) [J].
Apajasalo, M ;
Sintonen, H ;
Holmberg, C ;
Sinkkonen, J ;
Aalberg, V ;
Pihko, H ;
Siimes, MA ;
Kaitila, I ;
Makela, A ;
Rantakari, K ;
Anttila, R ;
Rautonen, J .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 1996, 5 (02) :205-211
[3]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[4]   DEVELOPING MULTIATTRIBUTE HEALTH INDEXES [J].
BOYLE, MH ;
TORRANCE, GW .
MEDICAL CARE, 1984, 22 (11) :1045-1057
[5]   EuroQol: The current state of play [J].
Brooks, R .
HEALTH POLICY, 1996, 37 (01) :53-72
[6]  
BULLINGER M, 1993, QUALITY OF LIFE ASSESSMENT : KEY ISSUES IN THE 1990S, P209
[7]  
Fallowfield L., 1990, QUALITY LIFE MISSING
[8]   RESPONSIVENESS AND VALIDITY IN HEALTH-STATUS MEASUREMENT - A CLARIFICATION [J].
GUYATT, GH ;
DEYO, RA ;
CHARLSON, M ;
LEVINE, MN ;
MITCHELL, A .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1989, 42 (05) :403-408
[9]   A comparison of the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) with four other generic utility instruments [J].
Hawthorne, G ;
Richardson, J ;
Day, NA .
ANNALS OF MEDICINE, 2001, 33 (05) :358-370
[10]   THE NOTTINGHAM HEALTH PROFILE - SUBJECTIVE HEALTH-STATUS AND MEDICAL CONSULTATIONS [J].
HUNT, SM ;
MCKENNA, SP ;
MCEWEN, J ;
WILLIAMS, J ;
PAPP, E .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE PART A-MEDICAL SOCIOLOGY, 1981, 15 (03) :221-229