Insuring Long-Term Care in the United States

被引:107
作者
Brown, Jeffrey R. [1 ,3 ]
Finkelstein, Amy [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[2] MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[3] Natl Bur Econ Res, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
INSURANCE; MEDICAID; MARKET; CROWD;
D O I
10.1257/jep.25.4.119
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Long-term care expenditures constitute one of the largest uninsured financial risks facing the elderly in the United States and thus play a central role in determining the retirement security of elderly Americans. In this essay, we begin by providing some background on the nature and extent of long-term care expenditures and insurance against those expenditures, emphasizing in particular the large and variable nature of the expenditures and the extreme paucity of private insurance coverage. We then provide some detail on the nature of the private long-term care insurance market and the available evidence on the reasons for its small size, including private market imperfections and factors that limit the demand for such insurance. We highlight how the availability of public long-term care insurance through Medicaid is an important factor suppressing the market for private long-term care insurance. In the final section, we describe and discuss recent long-term care insurance public policy initiatives at both the state and federal level.
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 141
页数:23
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
American Academy of Actuaries, 2009, CRIT ISS HLTH REF CO
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Long-term care for older people
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2011, PROVIDING PAYING LON
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Who buys long-term care insurance: a 15-year study of buyers and non-buyers
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2011, OECD StatExtracts."
[6]  
[Anonymous], FIN LONG TERM CAR EL
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2008, 14089 NBER
[8]  
Berkowitz Ben, 2010, REUTERS 1111
[9]  
Beshears J., 2008, LESSONS PENSION REFO, P59
[10]   The interaction of public and private insurance: Medicaid and the long-term care insurance market [J].
Brown, Jeffrey R. ;
Finkelstein, Amy .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2008, 98 (03) :1083-1102