Global hydrology modelling and uncertainty: running multiple ensembles with a campus grid

被引:53
作者
Gosling, Simon N. [1 ]
Bretherton, Dan [2 ]
Haines, Keith [2 ]
Arnell, Nigel W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Reading, Walker Inst Climate Syst Res, Reading RG6 6AR, Berks, England
[2] Univ Reading, ESSC, Reading RG6 6AL, Berks, England
来源
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES | 2010年 / 368卷 / 1926期
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
campus grid; high-throughput computing; global hydrology modelling; water resources; climate change uncertainty; climate change impacts; CLIMATE-CHANGE; WATER-RESOURCES; RUNOFF; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1098/rsta.2010.0164
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Uncertainties associated with the representation of various physical processes in global climate models (GCMs) mean that, when projections from GCMs are used in climate change impact studies, the uncertainty propagates through to the impact estimates. A complete treatment of this 'climate model structural uncertainty' is necessary so that decision-makers are presented with an uncertainty range around the impact estimates. This uncertainty is often underexplored owing to the human and computer processing time required to perform the numerous simulations. Here, we present a 189-member ensemble of global river runoff and water resource stress simulations that adequately address this uncertainty. Following several adaptations and modifications, the ensemble creation time has been reduced from 750 h on a typical single-processor personal computer to 9 h of high-throughput computing on the University of Reading Campus Grid. Here, we outline the changes that had to be made to the hydrological impacts model and to the Campus Grid, and present the main results. We show that, although there is considerable uncertainty in both the magnitude and the sign of regional runoff changes across different GCMs with climate change, there is much less uncertainty in runoff changes for regions that experience large runoff increases (e. g. the high northern latitudes and Central Asia) and large runoff decreases (e. g. the Mediterranean). Furthermore, there is consensus that the percentage of the global population at risk to water resource stress will increase with climate change.
引用
收藏
页码:4005 / 4021
页数:17
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2008, BUILD LOW CARB EC UK
[2]  
[Anonymous], DIG SOIL MAP WORLD
[3]   Climate change and global water resources: SRES emissions and socio-economic scenarios [J].
Arnell, NW .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2004, 14 (01) :31-52
[4]  
Barontini S., 2009, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussion, V6, P3089, DOI [DOI 10.5194/HESSD-6-3089-2009, 10.5194/hessd-6-3089-2009]
[5]   Climate change impacts on runoff in Sweden -: assessments by global climate models, dynamical downscaling and hydrological modelling [J].
Bergström, S ;
Carlsson, B ;
Gardelin, M ;
Lindström, G ;
Pettersson, A ;
Rummukainen, M .
CLIMATE RESEARCH, 2001, 16 (02) :101-112
[6]   Effect of GCM bias on downscaled precipitation and runoff projections for the Serpentine catchment, Western Australia [J].
Charles, S. P. ;
Bari, M. A. ;
Kitsios, A. ;
Bates, B. C. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY, 2007, 27 (12) :1673-1690
[7]   Global land cover classifications at 8 km spatial resolution: the use of training data derived from Landsat imagery in decision tree classifiers [J].
De Fries, RS ;
Hansen, M ;
Townshend, JRG ;
Sohlberg, R .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 1998, 19 (16) :3141-3168
[8]   Storm tracking with remote data and distributed computing [J].
Froude, Lizzie S. R. .
COMPUTERS & GEOSCIENCES, 2008, 34 (11) :1621-1630
[9]   Performance metrics for climate models [J].
Gleckler, P. J. ;
Taylor, K. E. ;
Doutriaux, C. .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2008, 113 (D6)
[10]   Simulating current global river runoff with a global hydrological model: model revisions, validation, and sensitivity analysis [J].
Gosling, Simon N. ;
Arnell, Nigel W. .
HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2011, 25 (07) :1129-1145