Psychological distress in women seeking genetic counseling for breast-ovarian cancer risk: The contributions of personality and appraisal

被引:97
作者
Audrain, J
Schwartz, MD
Lerman, C
Hughes, C
Peshkin, BN
Biesecker, B
机构
[1] Georgetown Univ, Med Ctr, Lombardi Canc Ctr, Washington, DC 20007 USA
[2] NIH, Ctr Human Genome Res, Bethesda, MD USA
关键词
D O I
10.1007/BF02895156
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The purpose of the present study was two-fold: (a) to characterize the psychological status of women with a family history of breast or ovarian cancer who self-refer for genetic counseling and BRCA1 testing; and (b) to identify specific demographic, personality and appraisal factors that contribute to cancer-specific distress and general distress in this group of women. Participants were 256 women ages 18 and older who had at least one first-degree relative (FDR) with breast and/or ovarian cancer: Participants were recruited through breast cancer clinics and obstetrics/gynecology departments at two medical centers by responding to program information described in a brochure. The results revealed moderate distress levels in this population. The results of a hierarchical regression of general distress indicated that women with higher levels of general distress were less likely to be married, less optimistic, and had heightened breast cancer risk perceptions accompanied by feelings of low perceptions of control over the development of breast cancer (R-2 = .44, p = .0001). Women with higher levels of cancer-specific distress tended to be younger and non-White and had low perceptions of control over developing breast cancer (R-2 = .15, p = .0002). These findings suggest that self-referred genetic counseling participants may be psychologically vulnerable and may benefit from interventions designed to decrease distress and the perceived absence of control over developing breast cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:370 / 377
页数:8
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
*AM CANC SOC, 1996, CANC FACTS FIG 1996
[2]   MODELING COGNITIVE ADAPTATION - A LONGITUDINAL INVESTIGATION OF THE IMPACT OF INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES AND COPING ON COLLEGE ADJUSTMENT AND PERFORMANCE [J].
ASPINWALL, LG ;
TAYLOR, SE .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 63 (06) :989-1003
[3]  
AUDRAIN J, 1995, CANCER EPIDEM BIOMAR, V4, P561
[4]   PSYCHOLOGICAL RESPONSE TO CANCER-DIAGNOSIS .2. EVIDENCE FOR COPING STYLES (COPING STYLES AND CANCER-DIAGNOSIS) [J].
BURGESS, C ;
MORRIS, T ;
PETTINGALE, KW .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 1988, 32 (03) :263-272
[5]  
CARVER CS, 1994, CANCER, V73, P1213, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19940215)73:4<1213::AID-CNCR2820730415>3.0.CO
[6]  
2-Q
[7]   HOW COPING MEDIATES THE EFFECT OF OPTIMISM ON DISTRESS - A STUDY OF WOMEN WITH EARLY-STAGE BREAST-CANCER [J].
CARVER, CS ;
POZO, C ;
HARRIS, SD ;
NORIEGA, V ;
SCHEIER, MF ;
ROBINSON, DS ;
KETCHAM, AS ;
MOFFAT, FL ;
CLARK, KC .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 65 (02) :375-390
[8]   FREQUENCY AND CORRELATES OF POSTTRAUMATIC-STRESS-DISORDER-LIKE SYMPTOMS AFTER TREATMENT FOR BREAST-CANCER [J].
CORDOVA, MJ ;
ANDRYKOWSKI, MA ;
KENADY, DE ;
MCGRATH, PC ;
SLOAN, DA ;
REDD, WH .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1995, 63 (06) :981-986
[9]  
CROYLE RT, 1997, IN PRESS HLTH PSYCHO
[10]   HOPKINS SYMPTOM CHECKLIST (HSCL) - SELF-REPORT SYMPTOM INVENTORY [J].
DEROGATIS, LR ;
LIPMAN, RS ;
RICKELS, K ;
UHLENHUTH, EH ;
COVI, L .
BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE, 1974, 19 (01) :1-15